Teams

Parvizian/18/3.5M/STONE

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.29 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Phillippi/Laterrade-18/3.5/M/Pelican10047312242
2Billings/18/3.5/M/Stonecreek73351536318
3Looper-18/3.5/M/Pelican55232758440
4Griffin-18/3.5/M/N.Cypress55222861453
5Parvizian/18/3.5M/STONE37203064452
6Kopanke/Edwards-18/3.5/M/Pelican01034796579

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Brandon Migliore
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
3.31
Charles Renwick
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published 3.5
3.22
Edward Bergeron
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Brandon Beyl
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.97
Brian Darr
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.72
Allen Amir Parvizian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Jackson Ward
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
Jason Rolling
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Jeffrey Barach
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Neal Daigle
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Kramer
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Roderick Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Russell Arthur
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Ryan Nash
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Short
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Ty McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Migliore + Jeffrey Barach314 matchesnot enough data
Russell Arthur + Jason Rolling033 matchesnot enough data
Roderick Chandler + Charles Renwick303 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Barach + Jason Rolling213 matchesnot enough data
Brandon Beyl + Brian Darr303 matchesnot enough data
Richard Kramer + Neal Daigle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandon Migliore
30W–6L career · 22 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Charles Renwick
11W–11L career · 17 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Edward Bergeron
8W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Brandon Beyl
32W–12L career · 32 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Brian Darr
25W–19L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
26W–25L career · 30 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Jackson Ward
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Jason Rolling
43W–20L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Barach
16W–16L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Neal Daigle
13W–14L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Kramer
6W–10L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roderick Chandler
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Russell Arthur
17W–11L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Nash
11W–16L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Short
9W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ty McGuire
14W–15L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.