Teams

MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 55AW9.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-28vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Choye / Janet Tallett vs Paula Moser / Andrea Barnes0-6, 1-6
2023-05-24vs SHARON HTS CC 55AW9.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Tallett / Hsiao-Yun Yang vs Christine Dumery / Robin Johnston2-6, 1-6
2023-05-23vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesKristina Weaver / Janet Tallett vs Catherine Vowles / Amy Browne6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-14vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristina Weaver / Janet Tallett vs Irene Otten / Lynn Stanghellini6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aina Lu
published 4.5
3.88
Junko Ohoka
published
3.81
Kristina Weaver
published
3.77
Lori Cruz-Spray
published
3.75
Christine Choye
published 4
3.72
Janet Tallett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.66
Amanda Kao
published 4
3.65
Sophia Fujioka
published
3.63
Isabelle Fateh
published
3.54
Janet Oshiro
published
3.52
Ellen Hilbrich
published
3.46
Kaori Enomoto
published
Hsiao-Yun Yang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Fujioka + Isabelle Fateh5253% games+5.6% vs expected
Lori Cruz-Spray + Junko Ohoka033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aina Lu
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Junko Ohoka
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Kristina Weaver
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Lori Cruz-Spray
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Christine Choye
21W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Janet Tallett
91W–65L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Amanda Kao
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Sophia Fujioka
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Isabelle Fateh
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Janet Oshiro
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.54
Ellen Hilbrich
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.52
Kaori Enomoto
20W–22L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Hsiao-Yun Yang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.