Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.96 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Christine Fotheringham
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4.5
3.96
Alisa Gardner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Daisy Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Dalynn Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.75
Amy Earl
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Kim Cronin
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Chandi Hurd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.67
Mindy Dunyon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.66
Emily Benton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Deanne Goaslind
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Annette Knight
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.55
Katie Swensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Jessica Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Gretel Sampson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Alena Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Swensen + Christine Fotheringham6080% games+19.3% vs expected
Annette Knight + Emily Benton4264% games+15.0% vs expected
Gretel Sampson + Alisa Gardner11366% games+14.1% vs expected
Amy Earl + Kim Cronin4262% games+14.0% vs expected
Amy Earl + Alisa Gardner19369% games+11.7% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Alisa Gardner14068% games+11.4% vs expected
Alisa Gardner + Christine Fotheringham14562% games+10.5% vs expected
Jessica Gardner + Alisa Gardner8160% games+10.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Fotheringham
213W–62L career · 11 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Alisa Gardner
197W–48L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Daisy Carlson
186W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Dalynn Thomas
77W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amy Earl
108W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Kim Cronin
380W–238L career · 18 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Chandi Hurd
183W–142L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Mindy Dunyon
121W–85L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Emily Benton
148W–120L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Deanne Goaslind
62W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Annette Knight
58W–66L career · 8 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Katie Swensen
102W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jessica Gardner
81W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Alena Taylor
174W–200L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.