Teams

Park City MARC-Dickey/Heywood

2025 Tri Level League · 18-39 W3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-31vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaWon 20
W#1 DoublesShayna Dickey / Lauren Meyerholz vs Ellie Jacobs / Sarah Ashley7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicole Angerbauer / Chelsea Watts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-17vs GladiatrixLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Heller / Chezney Davies vs Celest Andrade / Emily Bourke4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesNicole Angerbauer / Megan Leonard vs Sarah Villareal / Meghan Kellner1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Watts / Nike Hawkes vs Melina Ward / Lori Prince Hagood0-6, 3-6
2025-07-10vs Cottonwood Club-NielsenWon 21
W#1 DoublesShayna Dickey / Chezney Davies vs Rachel Callister / Sara Russell3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Heller / Megan Leonard vs Jamuna Nielsen / Maddie Hansen7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNicole Angerbauer / Chelsea Watts vs Karol Liced Sanchez Vanegas / Melissa Kent6-2, 6-2
2025-06-26vs UT/FARR/TRILEVEL/W3.0/3.5/4.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Heywood / Nicole Angerbauer vs Tessa Gurney / Rachel Mcillece3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNike Hawkes / Chelsea Watts vs Annie Mortensen / Kaitlyn Willmore3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-19vs Utah Volleys-Hatch/PlanckLost 12
L#1 DoublesChezney Davies / Rose Packer vs Markell Tanner / Hayley Pfister1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Heywood / Lauren Heller vs Carly Planck / Ellie Smith1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNike Hawkes / Chelsea Watts vs Stephanie Webb / Christa Orozco3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-12vs Court CharmersWon 20
W#2 DoublesMegan Leonard / Nicole Angerbauer vs Jordan Osborne / Laura Needham6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChelsea Watts / Elizabeth Heywood vs Madison Milligan / Hailey Jensen6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18-39 W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chezney Davies
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Lauren Meyerholz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Megan Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Angerbauer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Elizabeth Heywood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Chelsea Watts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Nike Hawkes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lauren Heller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rose Packer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shayna Dickey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Watts + Nike Hawkes4547% games−0.1% vs expected
Chelsea Watts + Elizabeth Heywood314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chezney Davies
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Meyerholz
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Megan Leonard
35W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Nicole Angerbauer
21W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Heywood
26W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Chelsea Watts
32W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Nike Hawkes
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lauren Heller
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rose Packer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shayna Dickey
22W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.