Teams

Utah Volleys-Hatch/Planck

2025 Tri Level League · 18-39 W3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-07vs UT/FARR/TRILEVEL/W3.0/3.5/4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesHayley Pfister / Markell Tanner vs Mae Alexander / Britany Egan2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSeidi Bennett / Rachel Hatch vs Lexi Farr / Tessa Gurney6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Webb / Emily Hill vs Summer Ellis / Annie Mortensen6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-07-31vs Liberty Park Tennis-MooreSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelsey Glassberg / Hayley Pfister vs Alexis McCall / Carolyn Schmitz2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarly Planck / Stephanie Webb vs Jenna DeLong / Catherine Davey6-1, 6-3
2025-07-17vs Court CharmersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarkell Tanner / Kelsey Glassberg vs Katie Martin / Stephanie Walzer1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChrista Orozco / Ellie Smith vs Marieke Timmer / Breanna Lamont4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-07-10vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaWon 20
W#2 DoublesRachel Hatch / Carly Planck vs Natalie Romaniw / Stacia Carroll6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChrista Orozco / Emily Hill vs Mariya Coleman / Kaestle Muir6-3, 6-4
2025-07-03vs GladiatrixLost 02
L#1 DoublesEllie Smith / Kelsey Glassberg vs Kala Riester / Emily Bourke1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarly Planck / Rachel Hatch vs Celest Andrade / Katie Leikin5-7, 2-6
2025-06-26vs Cottonwood Club-NielsenWon 21
L#1 DoublesSeidi Bennett / Kelsey Glassberg vs Julia Troy / Haley H Moreno3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Hatch / Carly Planck vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChrista Orozco / Stephanie Webb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-19vs Park City MARC-Dickey/HeywoodWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarkell Tanner / Hayley Pfister vs Chezney Davies / Rose Packer6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarly Planck / Ellie Smith vs Elizabeth Heywood / Lauren Heller6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie Webb / Christa Orozco vs Nike Hawkes / Chelsea Watts3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-12vs UT/FARR/TRILEVEL/W3.0/3.5/4.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSeidi Bennett / Kelsey Glassberg vs Mae Alexander / Charli Franco3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHayley Pfister / Jaimie Ribera vs Bethany Bodily / Lexi Farr1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChrista Orozco / Stephanie Webb vs Tori Locke / Chelsea Spencer2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18-39 W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Rachel Hatch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Seidi Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Hayley Pfister
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Carly Planck
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Jaimie Ribera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Christa Orozco
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Kelsey Glassberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Ellie Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Stephanie Webb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Emily Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Markell Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carly Planck + Rachel Hatch10165% games+9.7% vs expected
Seidi Bennett + Rachel Hatch5072% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Webb + Christa Orozco224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachel Hatch
61W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Seidi Bennett
96W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Hayley Pfister
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Carly Planck
54W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jaimie Ribera
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Christa Orozco
27W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Kelsey Glassberg
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Ellie Smith
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
Stephanie Webb
48W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Emily Hill
17W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Markell Tanner
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.