Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna

2025 Tri Level League · 18-39 W3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-07vs Cottonwood Club-NielsenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatrina Mills / Alison Floyd vs Liesl Lambert / Jamuna Nielsen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSachiko Osterloh / Ellie Jacobs vs Michelle Lynn Maxfield / Haley H Moreno6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-31vs Park City MARC-Dickey/HeywoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllie Jacobs / Sarah Ashley vs Shayna Dickey / Lauren Meyerholz6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-17vs UT/FARR/TRILEVEL/W3.0/3.5/4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStacia Carroll / Natalie Romaniw vs Mae Alexander / Emily Hales2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKatrina Mills / Sarah Ashley vs Britany Egan / Emily Kelly1-6, 4-6
2025-07-12vs Court CharmersWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatalie Romaniw / Stacia Carroll vs Elma Tatarevic / Katie Martin3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Ashley / Ellie Jacobs vs Jordan Osborne / Breanna Lamont6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaestle Muir / Katrina Mills vs Paige Smathers / Carly Ferro3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-10vs Utah Volleys-Hatch/PlanckLost 02
L#2 DoublesNatalie Romaniw / Stacia Carroll vs Rachel Hatch / Carly Planck3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMariya Coleman / Kaestle Muir vs Christa Orozco / Emily Hill3-6, 4-6
2025-06-26vs Liberty Park Tennis-MooreLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacia Carroll / Natalie Romaniw vs Carolyn Schmitz / Alexis McCall3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSam Steiner / Alison Floyd vs Heather Evans / Catherine van Uitert1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMariya Coleman / Kaestle Muir vs Nicole Huston / Amanda Robinson7-5, 6-3
2025-06-19vs GladiatrixLost 02
L#1 DoublesSam Steiner / Sarah Ashley vs Kala Riester / Katie Leikin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMariya Coleman / Katrina Mills vs Lori Prince Hagood / Melina Ward4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-12vs Cottonwood Club-NielsenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEllie Jacobs / Sachiko Osterloh vs Haley H Moreno / Maddie Hansen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Romaniw / Stacia Carroll vs Mary Diaz Gordon / Karol Liced Sanchez Vanegas6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18-39 W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Natalie Romaniw
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Ellie Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Stacia Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Kendall Armstrong
published
3.11
Sachiko Osterloh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Sam Steiner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Katrina Mills
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Alison Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
published 3
2.62
Mariya Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kaestle Muir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Ashley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Romaniw + Stacia Carroll15957% games+11.2% vs expected
Ellie Jacobs + Sachiko Osterloh3261% games+4.5% vs expected
Kaestle Muir + Sam Steiner0835% games−4.2% vs expected
Ellie Jacobs + Delia Bayna224 matchesnot enough data
Sachiko Osterloh + Delia Bayna224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalie Romaniw
35W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Ellie Jacobs
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Stacia Carroll
50W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Kendall Armstrong
27W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Sachiko Osterloh
26W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Sam Steiner
5W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.91
Katrina Mills
62W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Alison Floyd
31W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Mariya Coleman
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.62
Kaestle Muir
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Ashley
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.