Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0B

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-06vs GREENBROOK RS 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Carey / Donna Vis vs Kathleen Olla / Karen Wisser1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Donna Himenez
published 4
3.96
Traci Krueger
published
3.90
Athena Lofquist
published 4
3.90
Janell Mollenhauer
published
3.82
Laurie Radanovich
published
3.77
Garbo Berger
published 4
3.77
3.76
Shay Martin
published
3.76
Heidi Belton
published 4
3.75
3.65
Shari Gonzalez
published
3.64
Donna Vis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Darcy Beauchemin
published 4
3.58
Tami Lightle
published
3.54
Kimberly Caison
published
3.37
Nga Gross
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.11
Karen Treppa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shari Gonzalez + Darcy Beauchemin4258% games+4.0% vs expected
Donna Himenez + Heidi Belton7161% games+2.1% vs expected
Traci Krueger + Laurie Radanovich7164% games+1.0% vs expected
Athena Lofquist + Janell Mollenhauer213 matchesnot enough data
Shay Martin + Darcy Beauchemin033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Caison + Nga Gross213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Himenez
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
Traci Krueger
33W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Athena Lofquist
26W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
Janell Mollenhauer
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
Laurie Radanovich
44W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Garbo Berger
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Tina Sorensen Berman
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.77
Shay Martin
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Heidi Belton
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christine Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Shari Gonzalez
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Donna Vis
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Darcy Beauchemin
23W–13L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Tami Lightle
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Kimberly Caison
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
Nga Gross
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Karen Treppa
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.