Teams

GEPTA/Avila/40and over/3.5MX

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Avila/40and over/3.5MX73181229256
2GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Refaeian/FB64151534281
3GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Estrada/EPTC#155171331270
4GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Caire/EPTC#255151536295
5GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC55141641305
6GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Orozco/TW28111942305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Alexandra Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Jammie Price
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.30
Cesar Damian Carlos
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
3.20
Erika Centeno
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 3.5
2.72
Daniel Avila
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jesus Monarrez
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Joe Centeno
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Kraig White
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Kristen Swanson-Pallares
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Omar Cervantes-Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Phillip Cortez
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Vanessa White
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Veronica Abreo
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Abreo + Phillip Cortez8159% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Swanson-Pallares + Erika Centeno6257% gamesnot enough data
Alexandra Ortiz + Cesar Damian Carlos5165% gamesnot enough data
Joe Centeno + Erika Centeno1543% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa White + Kraig White044 matchesnot enough data
Jesus Monarrez + Erika Centeno033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexandra Ortiz
34W–36L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Jammie Price
47W–44L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Cesar Damian Carlos
88W–93L career · 22 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Erika Centeno
36W–25L career · 17 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Daniel Avila
14W–43L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.72
Jesus Monarrez
30W–35L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joe Centeno
44W–34L career · 44 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kraig White
18W–56L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Swanson-Pallares
76W–35L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Omar Cervantes-Lopez
40W–55L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Phillip Cortez
31W–32L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vanessa White
11W–32L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Veronica Abreo
44W–35L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.