Teams

GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Caire/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Avila/40and over/3.5MX73181229256
2GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Refaeian/FB64151534281
3GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Estrada/EPTC#155171331270
4GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Caire/EPTC#255151536295
5GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC55141641305
6GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Orozco/TW28111942305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Annette Segesman
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.23
Claire Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.95
Alejandro Borunda
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Enrique Mata
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Gabriel Soto
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Gloria King
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Javier MacIas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Juan Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lori Armendariz
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Richard Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Rosanna Missirian
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Steven King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tatiana Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Yuri Caire
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Herrera + Lori Armendariz4450% gamesnot enough data
Lori Armendariz + Yuri Caire3350% gamesnot enough data
Lori Armendariz + Annette Segesman4250% gamesnot enough data
Gabriel Soto + Alejandro Borunda3249% gamesnot enough data
Tatiana Fernandez + Enrique Mata213 matchesnot enough data
Tatiana Fernandez + Javier MacIas213 matchesnot enough data
Javier MacIas + Yuri Caire213 matchesnot enough data
Gloria King + Yuri Caire213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annette Segesman
50W–49L career · 22 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Claire Brandon
36W–46L career · 23 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Alejandro Borunda
27W–20L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Enrique Mata
56W–103L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gabriel Soto
39W–42L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 61 lines in 2026
not enough data
Javier MacIas
31W–19L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Herrera
42W–44L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Armendariz
55W–56L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Ramos
24W–43L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosanna Missirian
111W–86L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven King
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tatiana Fernandez
51W–15L career · 34 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yuri Caire
52W–39L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.