GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.36 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Schedule2 played

2026-08-11Lost 0–1

L#2 DoublesMatthew Kerr / Anna Camille Kerr vs Veronica Abreo / Phillip Cortez1-6, 0-6

2026-07-14Won 1–0

W#3 DoublesMatthew Kerr / Anna Camille Kerr vs Carlos Meza / Dolly Ricks6-2, 4-6, 1-0

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings6 teams · 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Avila/40and over/3.5MX	7	3	18	12	29	256
2GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Refaeian/FB	6	4	15	15	34	281
3GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Estrada/EPTC#1	5	5	17	13	31	270
4GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Caire/EPTC#2	5	5	15	15	36	295
5GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC	5	5	14	16	41	305
6GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Orozco/TW	2	8	11	19	42	305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47

Enrique Mirazo

usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

3.25

Greg DiDonna

usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3.5

3.17

Greg Daw

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.17

Anna Camille Kerr

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.10

Joey Hass

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

3.09

Chrissy Segaline

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

2.98

Bill Ruddock

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3

2.84

Allene Mirazo

usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3

—

Juana Lopez

usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Kathy Cartwright

usually #3 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published —

—

Laura Leslie

usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Lilia DuRussel

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa

usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Matthew Kerr

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Micah Harrison

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Paul Leslie

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Terry Calhoun

usually #3 Doubles 51%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published —

—

Wendy Bloss

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Leslie + Enrique Mirazo	2–6	41% games	+5.4% vs expected
Laura Leslie + Wendy Bloss	3–5	50% games	+4.3% vs expected
Joey Hass + Wendy Bloss	4–2	52% games	+2.6% vs expected
Paul Leslie + Micah Harrison	17–7	53% games	+0.4% vs expected
Terry Calhoun + Greg Daw	9–13	49% games	−0.1% vs expected
Kathy Cartwright + Anna Camille Kerr	8–2	54% games	not enough data
Kathy Cartwright + Terry Calhoun	6–3	61% games	not enough data
Laura Leslie + Anna Camille Kerr	5–1	56% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Enrique Mirazo

80W–94L career · 30 lines in 2026

<1%59%41%

3.47

3.5

Greg DiDonna

22W–30L career · 15 lines in 2026

3%95%3%

3.25

3.5

Greg Daw

65W–74L career · 21 lines in 2026

9%90%1%

3.17

3.5

Anna Camille Kerr

42W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026

9%90%1%

3.17

—

Joey Hass

66W–86L career · 5 lines in 2026

21%78%<1%

3.10

3.5

Chrissy Segaline

21W–58L career · 9 lines in 2026

25%75%<1%

3.09

Bill Ruddock

77W–83L career · 35 lines in 2026

<1%55%44%

2.98

Allene Mirazo

66W–72L career · 32 lines in 2026

<1%89%11%

2.84

—

Juana Lopez

63W–23L career · 32 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Kathy Cartwright

97W–61L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Laura Leslie

47W–65L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lilia DuRussel

28W–34L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa

67W–62L career · 38 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Matthew Kerr

1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Micah Harrison

49W–63L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Paul Leslie

90W–80L career · 24 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Terry Calhoun

76W–68L career · 37 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Wendy Bloss

28W–37L career · 10 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.