Teams

4HV-ENRIGHT 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F1

2023 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · MEN 65 COMBO SEM

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesSrinivasa Shankar / Nathaniel Kinsky vs Alex Cao / John Reynolds6-4, 7-5
2023-12-09vs 2MONY-GLENN 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrad Beaver / Srinivasa Shankar vs Rick Tagliaferri / Mark Lemancik3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJeff Linden / Bruce Shields vs Victor Nambo / Lou DeBoer4-6, 2-6
2023-11-19Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRick Mintz / Brad Beaver vs Brad Stieber / Brian Loh1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRoman Giger / Nathaniel Kinsky vs Jeremy Jeruzal / Mike Wood1-6, 2-6
2023-11-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesNed Staebler / Jeff Linden vs Vijay Sankaran / Eric Lawson6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesRick Mintz / Brad Beaver vs Ryan Fitzpatrick / Tim Crouson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeff Linden / Ned Staebler vs Faisal Qayumi / Steve Schrupp6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNathaniel Kinsky / Bruce Shields vs Nathan Moseley / Harrison Lee4-6, 3-6
2023-10-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRoman Giger / Chang Sun vs Timothy Arthur / Ricardo de Majo1-6, 0-6
2023-10-07vs 2MONY-GLENN 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F1Won 21
W#1 DoublesRick Mintz / Jeff Clark vs Cole Glenn / David Barnett4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNed Staebler / Chang Sun vs Rick Tagliaferri / SANJEEVI PONDICHERY SUBRAMANIAN4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Linden / Todd Moore vs Koji Yanagisawa / Mark Lemancik1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · MEN 65 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
16LIB-BRICENO 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F17117716155
24PEACH-HOMBREBUENO 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F26117412145
32FAC-ADAPA 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F36216820206
42MONY-GLENN 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F15315922204
53BLOOM-CHUKKAPALLI 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F35315924198
66SCWB-UNO 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F353141025229
71VTC-FITZPATRICK 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F144111328211
83PH-EVENSON 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F23491226193
94BLOOM-DAYANANTHAN 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F335101429224
105LIB-KATAKOWSKI 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F12691532232
114HV-ENRIGHT 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F12681635262
122EAST-BONVENTRE 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F21541430198
135SCWB-GAY 6.5M COMBO W/E SEM F30822244279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Bradley Pavlik
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Kamran Diba
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.42
Ned Staebler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.35
Srinivasa Shankar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Rick Mintz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jeff Linden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Chang Sun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Roman Giger
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Brad Beaver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Bruce Shields
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Ed Kulik
published 3
Jeff Clark
published
Nathaniel Kinsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Enright
published
Todd Moore
published
William Birdsong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Enright + Roman Giger6255% games+5.7% vs expected
Rick Mintz + Brad Beaver3243% games−2.9% vs expected
Bruce Shields + Brad Beaver4648% games−3.3% vs expected
Kamran Diba + William Birdsong134 matchesnot enough data
Ed Kulik + Bruce Shields224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Linden + Brad Beaver314 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Pavlik + Chang Sun224 matchesnot enough data
Rick Mintz + Jeff Clark213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bradley Pavlik
90W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.73
3.5
Kamran Diba
110W–101L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Ned Staebler
55W–30L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Srinivasa Shankar
43W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Rick Mintz
92W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Jeff Linden
53W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Chang Sun
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
3.5
Roman Giger
26W–39L career · 8 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Brad Beaver
26W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Bruce Shields
30W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Ed Kulik
16W–26L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Clark
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nathaniel Kinsky
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Enright
32W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Moore
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Birdsong
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.