Teams

Stosich

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 8.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-12vs PocatelloWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Nelson / Mona Palmer vs Gina Breding / Sylvia Williams6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Beebe / Tresa Mason vs Syndee Kemp / Nyla Kress3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCyndy Boorman / Melanie Smith vs Dolly Gonzales / Sally Nielson6-2, 6-2
2023-05-09vs NelsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesJackie Fuller / Renee Schart vs Heather Silverman / Collette Bott6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelanie Smith / Teresa Beebe vs Michelle Sayer / Julie Umphlette6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Nelson / Mona Palmer vs Margo Nef / Angie Fadness6-0, 6-1
2023-05-05vs NelsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Nelson / Cyndy Boorman vs Heather Silverman / Collette Bott5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTresa Mason / Deborah Stosich vs Lynda Fennern / Julie Umphlette4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Roach / Melanie Smith vs Angie Fadness / Margo Nef6-4, 6-2
2023-05-01vs PocatelloSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTresa Mason / Deborah Stosich vs Sally Nielson / Sherri Smith2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMona Palmer / Cyndy Boorman vs Gina Breding / Nyla Kress6-2, 6-3
2023-04-29vs NelsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJackie Fuller / Tresa Mason vs Collette Bott / Cheri Witz6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCyndy Boorman / Debbie Hall vs Lynda Fennern / Lisa Wheeler6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelanie Smith / Deborah Stosich vs Kathy Lloyd / Jacqualyn Nelson6-2, 6-0
2023-04-27vs PocatelloWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Roach / Cyndy Boorman vs Sally Nielson / Sherri Smith3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRenee Schart / Deborah Stosich vs Nyla Kress / Sylvia Williams6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJackie Fuller / Tresa Mason vs Dolly Gonzales / Kelly Wathne4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-22vs PocatelloLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Schart / Deborah Stosich vs Sylvia Williams / Sherri Smith3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hall / Mona Palmer vs Nyla Kress / Gina Breding6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-21vs NelsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesTresa Mason / Teresa Beebe vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Tamara Gardner6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Harris / Debbie Hall vs Cheri Witz / Linda Merigliano2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMona Palmer / Lisa Roach vs Lisa Wheeler / Lynda Fennern6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 8.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pocatello53141024195
2Stosich44121225180
3Nelson35101433241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cyndy Boorman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Tresa Mason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.68
Melanie Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Melanie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Deborah Stosich
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Teresa Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jackie Fuller
published
Karen Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mona Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Renee Schart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Nelson + Cyndy Boorman5258% games+6.4% vs expected
Teresa Beebe + Tresa Mason3353% games−3.7% vs expected
Deborah Stosich + Tresa Mason3445% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Nelson + Mona Palmer3257% gamesnot enough data
Cyndy Boorman + Melanie Smith5068% gamesnot enough data
Renee Schart + Deborah Stosich213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Harris + Melanie Nelson303 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Nelson + Melanie Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cyndy Boorman
59W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4.5
Tresa Mason
140W–158L career · 6 lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.83
4
Melanie Nelson
87W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Melanie Smith
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Deborah Stosich
78W–81L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Teresa Beebe
103W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Jackie Fuller
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Harris
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mona Palmer
21W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Schart
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.