Teams

Pocatello

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 8.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-12vs StosichLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Breding / Sylvia Williams vs Melanie Nelson / Mona Palmer3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSyndee Kemp / Nyla Kress vs Teresa Beebe / Tresa Mason6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDolly Gonzales / Sally Nielson vs Cyndy Boorman / Melanie Smith2-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs NelsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesSyndee Kemp / Sylvia Williams vs Lynda Fennern / Michelle Sayer4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNyla Kress / Sally Nielson vs Tamara Gardner / Julie Umphlette6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCindy McRoberts / Kelly Wathne vs Kathy Lloyd / Jacqualyn Nelson6-3, 6-3
2023-05-02vs NelsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Nielson / Sherri Smith vs Linda Merigliano / Cheri Witz5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDolly Gonzales / Kathleen Sorenson vs Heather Silverman / Margo Nef0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCindy McRoberts / Sylvia Williams vs Carol Blanchard / Collette Bott6-1, 6-4
2023-05-01vs StosichWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Nielson / Sherri Smith vs Tresa Mason / Deborah Stosich6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGina Breding / Nyla Kress vs Mona Palmer / Cyndy Boorman2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSylvia Williams / Cindy McRoberts vs Jackie Fuller / Lisa Roach7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-27vs StosichLost 12
W#1 DoublesSally Nielson / Sherri Smith vs Lisa Roach / Cyndy Boorman6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNyla Kress / Sylvia Williams vs Renee Schart / Deborah Stosich0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDolly Gonzales / Kelly Wathne vs Jackie Fuller / Tresa Mason6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-24vs NelsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherri Smith / Sylvia Williams vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Kathy Lloyd5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNyla Kress / Gina Breding vs Tamara Gardner / Carol Blanchard6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDolly Gonzales / Kathleen Sorenson vs Lynda Fennern / Lisa Wheeler2-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs StosichWon 30
W#1 DoublesSylvia Williams / Sherri Smith vs Renee Schart / Deborah Stosich6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNyla Kress / Gina Breding vs Debbie Hall / Mona Palmer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDolly Gonzales / Kathleen Sorenson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-18vs NelsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesNyla Kress / Syndee Kemp vs Cheri Witz / Linda Merigliano7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSherri Smith / Sally Nielson vs Tamara Gardner / Lynda Fennern6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy McRoberts / Kelly Wathne vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Carol Blanchard6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 8.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pocatello53141024195
2Stosich44121225180
3Nelson35101433241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Nyla Kress
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.70
Kelly Wathne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Cindy McRoberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Sally Nielson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Syndee Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.20
Dolly Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Kathleen Sorenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gina Breding
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sylvia Williams
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nyla Kress + Sally Nielson7351% games−12.4% vs expected
Dolly Gonzales + Sally Nielson6846% games−20.0% vs expected
Cindy McRoberts + Kelly Wathne224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Sorenson + Dolly Gonzales033 matchesnot enough data
Dolly Gonzales + Sylvia Williams033 matchesnot enough data
Nyla Kress + Gina Breding213 matchesnot enough data
Sylvia Williams + Syndee Kemp033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nyla Kress
103W–54L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Kelly Wathne
163W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Cindy McRoberts
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Sally Nielson
37W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Syndee Kemp
38W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Dolly Gonzales
55W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Kathleen Sorenson
43W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
Gina Breding
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sylvia Williams
32W–42L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.