Teams

Schneiderman 3.5 55s Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · MEN 3.5 55 & Over Mon PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 55 & Over Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Timothy Shantry
published
3.31
Kenton Kreager
published
Carl Boggis
published 3.5
David Hancock
published 3.5
3.25
John Essa
published
3.22
Tom Barringer
published
3.18
Jeff Shue
published
3.17
Joseph Ganim
published
3.15
Lee Schneiderman
published
3.05
Jeff Ingle
published
3.01
Rick Truell
published
Russell Loseke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Schneiderman + John Essa3252% games+3.5% vs expected
Kenton Kreager + Lee Schneiderman3256% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Shantry + Rick Truell213 matchesnot enough data
Rick Truell + Carl Boggis033 matchesnot enough data
Tom Barringer + Lee Schneiderman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Shantry
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.41
Kenton Kreager
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carl Boggis
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Hancock
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Essa
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Tom Barringer
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Jeff Shue
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Joseph Ganim
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Lee Schneiderman
18W–27L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jeff Ingle
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Rick Truell
12W–25L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Russell Loseke
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.