Teams

PLEASANTON CM7.5C

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-10-29vs CROW CANYON CC CM7.5ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesPablo Gonzalez / Paul Timtiman vs Jason Cherry / Dennis Mcsweeney3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnil Kumar VEMULAPALLI / Balachandra Ambiga vs Jim Kruger / Steve Heninger6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesBen Sandler / Ahmed Murad vs Eugene Beyder / David Pintado4-6, 2-6
2025-10-19vs PLEASANTON CM7.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesPablo Gonzalez / Ramesh Konitineni vs Pravin Kumaradhas Lalitha / Praveenkumar Davidson3-6, 1-6
2025-10-12vs BAY CLUB PL CM7.5AWon 20
W#2 DoublesBalachandra Ambiga / Chaitanya Mamdur vs Jonathan Trinh / Jason Kight7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSanjiv Pandey / Sreerama Garikapati vs Rickie Jiang / Zhonghua Zheng5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesSanjiv Pandey / Sreerama Garikapati vs Rahi Patel / Alan Lam7-5, 6-2
2025-09-28vs FREMONT TC CM7.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesGabriel Mangonon / Balachandra Ambiga vs Raghavendra Thodime / Chirag Mehta2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesVijaya Bhargava / Paul Timtiman vs Clifton Pang / Kathir Kaman Rengasami1-6, 1-6
2025-09-28vs REFUGIO PK CM7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Holst / Ahmed Murad vs Alex Tayag / Joao Miguel Do Rego3-6, 5-7
2025-09-23vs MISSION HILLS CM7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesRamesh Konitineni / Srinivas Javvadi vs Ravindra Rathi / Krishna Kuchibhotla7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-21vs MEADOW STC CM7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Holst / Ahmed Murad vs Ari Hersher / Sanjay Vachani6-4, 6-4
2025-09-20vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS CM7.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesSanjiv Pandey / Paul Timtiman vs Bryan Wendleton / Akira Teshima6-3, 6-4
2025-09-07vs CROW CANYON CC CM7.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesSanjiv Pandey / Ramesh Konitineni vs Priyank Saxena / Vishal Shenoy6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Sanjiv Pandey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Dan Helmer
published 3.5
3.51
Vijaya Bhargava
published
3.50
Anil Kumar VEMULAPALLI
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Gabriel Ionita
published 4
3.41
Pradeep Nair
published
3.41
Srinivas Javvadi
published
3.40
3.38
Gabriel Mangonon
published 3.5
3.34
Ramesh Konitineni
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Paul Timtiman
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.31
Balachandra Ambiga
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Chaitanya Mamdur
published 3.5
Ahmed Murad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Raghu Venna
published
3.24
Sreerama Garikapati
published
3.14
3.11
Amol Chaudhari
published 3.5
Pablo Gonzalez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramesh Konitineni + Balachandra Ambiga11259% games+4.5% vs expected
Ramesh Konitineni + Paul Timtiman6354% games+2.6% vs expected
Chaitanya Mamdur + Sreerama Garikapati224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Timtiman + Balachandra Ambiga404 matchesnot enough data
Chaitanya Mamdur + Vamsikrishna Paladugu033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sanjiv Pandey
71W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
3.5
Dan Helmer
37W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Vijaya Bhargava
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Anil Kumar VEMULAPALLI
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Gabriel Ionita
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
Pradeep Nair
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Srinivas Javvadi
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.41
Santhosh Kumar Kuchoor
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Gabriel Mangonon
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Ramesh Konitineni
44W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Paul Timtiman
40W–39L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Balachandra Ambiga
45W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Chaitanya Mamdur
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ahmed Murad
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raghu Venna
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Sreerama Garikapati
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Vamsikrishna Paladugu
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Amol Chaudhari
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Pablo Gonzalez
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.