Teams

Womack 40s 3.5

2022 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-12vs Duhe 40s 3.5 StarmountWon 10
W#2 DoublesGracie Womack / Kim Hunt vs Amy Callaghan / Jen Strasser6-0, 6-2
2022-05-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnnie Chapman / Kim Hunt vs Tiffany Clark / Kelly Bankhead6-1, 6-3
2022-04-28vs Baker 40s 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Hunt / Lisa Liringis vs Leigh Abraham / Jenny Kemp6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Clancy/Varner 40s 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Hunt / Lisa Liringis vs Debbie Clancy / Serena Igharas3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-14vs Harding 40s 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Sumner / Kim Hunt vs Vania Robinson / Amy Proctor6-2, 6-1
2022-04-07vs Pollina 40s 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Fogleman / Kim Hunt vs Cheryl Scott / Lori Harrington6-3, 6-1
2022-04-03vs Miller 40s 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Dennehy / Kim Hunt vs Brandy Gillenwater / Shannon Roley6-2, 6-0
2022-03-17vs Joseph 40s 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesStacey Dennehy / Kim Hunt vs Catherine Joseph / Dixie Culver6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Annie Chapman
published 3.5
3.35
Gracie Womack
published 3.5
3.32
Martha Fogleman
published
3.28
Stacey Harris
published
3.26
Cindy Sumner
published 3.5
3.23
Tracey Weeks
published
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
published
3.10
Kelli Young
published
3.07
Patti Morgan
published
3.06
Debra Jessup
published 3.5
Lisa Cook
published
Lisa Liringis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Weeks + Kelli Young4256% games−5.1% vs expected
Martha Fogleman + Lisa Liringis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 12 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Annie Chapman
19W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Gracie Womack
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Stacey Harris
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cindy Sumner
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Tracey Weeks
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Kelli Young
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Patti Morgan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Debra Jessup
10W–21L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
Lisa Cook
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Liringis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.