Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Bev

2023 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC Women WD 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-07vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellySplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindi Juncal / Marianne Richards vs Rebekah Dent / Michelle Duenas1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNina Ames / Janice Trojan vs Missy Berchiolli / Christine Griffith6-4, 6-2
2023-06-23vs OC LNRC - Gina 1030Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCindi Juncal / Marianne Richards vs Courtney Zani / Kelly Kehlet2-6, 4-6
2023-06-16vs OC Dana Hills TC - DevonWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Reenders / Marianne Richards vs Devon Hogue / Wendy Earley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-09vs OC FVTC - Susie RuizWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarianne Richards / Michelle Smith vs Yumiko Tokiwa / Vera Garrard6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMarianne Richards / Michelle Smith vs SUSAN BROWN / Sunny Park6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-26vs OC Costa Mesa TC- Susie Kim 1030Split 11
L#1 DoublesLynn Moore / Marianne Richards vs Jennifer Lee / Yolanda Barocio2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNina Ames / Janice Trojan vs Trisha Coy / Rebecca Schrock3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-16vs OC LLW Great Park JoleenLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne Richards / Michelle Smith vs Stephanie Tarzia / Terry Ward6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesMarianne Richards vs Nikki Smith2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-28vs OC YLCC - Irene 11Won 10
W#1 SinglesMarianne Richards vs Annette Tran6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
3.87
Annette Drake
published 4
3.83
Marianne Richards
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 4
Amy Schetman
published 4
3.70
Patty Podley
published
3.63
Janice Trojan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Sonia Bishop
published
3.51
Nina Ames
published
3.50
Bev Merwin
published 3.5
3.48
JILL ESLICK
published 3.5
3.37
Barbara Springer
published 3.5
Renate Snow-Poe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Reenders
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Annette Drake
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Marianne Richards
98W–77L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Amy Schetman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Podley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Janice Trojan
27W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Sonia Bishop
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Nina Ames
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Bev Merwin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
JILL ESLICK
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Barbara Springer
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Renate Snow-Poe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.