Teams

A18 2.5W PM Tople

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-04-29vs A18 2.5W GR FosterWon 10
W#2 DoublesLora Alexander / Annie Robertson vs Melanie Conner / Bonnie Tongate0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 2.5W NC Adams8222820225
2A18 2.5W CRC Goldsmith64181226230
3A18 2.5W PW Hensley55161431255
4A18 2.5W PM Tople55151535268
5A18 2.5W TP Laux55141635278
6A18 2.5W WR Bolbach46121838288
7A18 2.5W CV Fromson37131738285
8A18 2.5W MV Wortmann37111940294
9A18 2.5W LT Mitchell1982246314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Robyn Rea
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Gabrielle Rankin
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.72
Jennifer Tople
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
2.70
Lindsay Tadsen
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
2.55
Valerie Quist
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.54
Maureen Kiko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Anne Canon
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Annie Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jane McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lora Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Muczyk
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabrielle Rankin + Lindsay Tadsen4357% games+8.6% vs expected
Robyn Rea + Lindsay Tadsen6551% games+5.0% vs expected
Jennifer Tople + Maureen Kiko4550% games+3.4% vs expected
Jennifer Tople + Gabrielle Rankin5253% games+2.8% vs expected
Robyn Rea + Gabrielle Rankin2349% games+2.4% vs expected
Jennifer Tople + Robyn Rea16953% games+2.2% vs expected
Valerie Quist + Sherry Muczyk2348% games−2.6% vs expected
Jennifer Tople + Lindsay Tadsen3839% games−8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Rea
39W–29L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Gabrielle Rankin
60W–59L career · 14 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Jennifer Tople
58W–60L career · 14 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Lindsay Tadsen
56W–59L career · 14 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Valerie Quist
78W–54L career · 10 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Maureen Kiko
29W–41L career · 10 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Anne Canon
22W–42L career · 8 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Annie Robertson
5W–3L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane McHugh
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lora Alexander
16W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sherry Muczyk
9W–8L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.