Teams

A18 2.5W CRC Goldsmith

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-04-15vs A18 2.5W MV3 WortmannLost 01
L#1 SinglesMargaret Ferretti vs Sara Nine1-6, 2-6
2023-02-04vs A18 2.5W WE StrawserLost 01
L#1 SinglesMargaret Ferretti vs Leigh Strawser4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 2.5W NC Adams8222820225
2A18 2.5W CRC Goldsmith64181226230
3A18 2.5W PW Hensley55161431255
4A18 2.5W PM Tople55151535268
5A18 2.5W TP Laux55141635278
6A18 2.5W WR Bolbach46121838288
7A18 2.5W CV Fromson37131738285
8A18 2.5W MV Wortmann37111940294
9A18 2.5W LT Mitchell1982246314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Alexis Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cynthia Burke
published 3
2.73
Kimberly Corbets
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Maya Tokmazeysky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.67
Natasha Kalas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.60
Montserrat de la Huerta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Mirna Ayache
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Nancy Goldsmith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Lela Henry
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.31
Meredith Bond
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
2.30
Lisa Vinocur
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.26
Anne Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Jenny Watson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Margaret Ferretti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Marina Timush
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tamara Medvedeva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natasha Kalas + Alexis Herzog6068% games+14.6% vs expected
Nancy Goldsmith + Meredith Bond2541% games−2.7% vs expected
Anne Cochran + Lisa Vinocur6946% games−3.4% vs expected
Kimberly Corbets + Alexis Herzog4256% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Goldsmith + Cynthia Burke134 matchesnot enough data
Lela Henry + Lisa Vinocur224 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Bond + Cynthia Burke033 matchesnot enough data
Lela Henry + Maya Tokmazeysky303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexis Herzog
30W–20L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Cynthia Burke
3W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Corbets
36W–25L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Maya Tokmazeysky
31W–30L career · 8 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Natasha Kalas
27W–41L career · 14 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Montserrat de la Huerta
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.60
Mirna Ayache
7W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%73%27%
2.42
Nancy Goldsmith
40W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.33
Lela Henry
34W–47L career · 7 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.33
Meredith Bond
41W–67L career · 11 lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.31
Lisa Vinocur
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.30
3
Anne Cochran
18W–29L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.26
Jenny Watson
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Ferretti
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marina Timush
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tamara Medvedeva
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.