Teams

A18 2.5W MV Wortmann

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 2.5W NC Adams8222820225
2A18 2.5W CRC Goldsmith64181226230
3A18 2.5W PW Hensley55161431255
4A18 2.5W PM Tople55151535268
5A18 2.5W TP Laux55141635278
6A18 2.5W WR Bolbach46121838288
7A18 2.5W CV Fromson37131738285
8A18 2.5W MV Wortmann37111940294
9A18 2.5W LT Mitchell1982246314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Gwen Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Felicia Norman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Catherine Lentini
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.58
Valerie Kuykendall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Sara Nine
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
2.49
Misty Morris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Giovanna Ventre
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.39
Jennifer OKeefe
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.32
Ritu Makkar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachelle Womeldorf
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicia Norman + Jennifer OKeefe4256% games+4.9% vs expected
Sara Nine + Jennifer OKeefe4448% games+0.2% vs expected
Felicia Norman + Catherine Lentini2440% games−9.1% vs expected
Valerie Kuykendall + Felicia Norman314 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Kuykendall + Misty Morris224 matchesnot enough data
Giovanna Ventre + Ritu Makkar224 matchesnot enough data
Ritu Makkar + Misty Morris134 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Kuykendall + Jennifer OKeefe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gwen Anderson
91W–67L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Felicia Norman
45W–36L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Catherine Lentini
20W–33L career · 11 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Valerie Kuykendall
37W–27L career · 8 lines in 2023
0%28%72%
2.58
Sara Nine
36W–29L career · 16 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.52
Misty Morris
20W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Giovanna Ventre
48W–52L career · 14 lines in 2023
0%75%25%
2.41
Jennifer OKeefe
38W–38L career · 12 lines in 2023
0%79%21%
2.39
Ritu Makkar
28W–50L career · 9 lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.32
Rachelle Womeldorf
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.