Teams

Woodlake Phelps

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Mon

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-01vs HCC ManginWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Teefey / Kelley Glen vs Susan Vonderlehr Nolan / Sally Caldwell6-2, 7-5
2021-10-18vs RMC FlowersLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelley Glen / Elizabeth Melhorn vs Jennifer Owens / Susan Powell2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Harris / Karen Hannon vs Brenda Tyson / Sharon Camden4-6, 1-6
2021-10-11vs KRA Gerecke / OgilvieLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Hannon / Robin Oldt vs Sara Winterhoff / Kerri Green6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMeaco Coffey / Jeanean Phelps vs Caroline Appich / Carlyle Walek6-7, 2-6
2021-10-06vs MAC Ealey / McDonoughLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Teefey / Kelley Glen vs Theresa Hughes / Jennifer Hughes3-6, 4-6
2021-09-27vs ACAC KrebsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Hannon / Laura Kelly vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Tatiana Smirnov1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Rosie Ortiz vs Gisele Aboujaoude / Rocio Rosa6-2, 6-2
2021-09-20vs TDC SweeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Melhorn / Kelley Glen vs Johanna Farrell / Deanna Jernigan7-5, 7-6
2021-09-13vs Westwood Payne / HassettLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Teefey / Stacy Wiseman vs Laura Strickler / Anna Shea4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRosie Ortiz / Jeanean Phelps vs Margaret Burke / Kacie Painter2-6, 4-6
2021-09-07vs TCRC OttoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrooke Teefey / Kelley Glen vs Lucinda Stuckey / Lara Green5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Oldt / Karen Hannon vs Virginia Grigg / Katherine Mortimer3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Brooke Teefey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Kelley Glen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.12
Robin Oldt
published
2.91
Crissy Poindexter
published 3.5
2.90
Jeanean Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Karen Hannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Rosie Ortiz
published
Meaco Coffey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Glen + Brooke Teefey211055% games+0.3% vs expected
Jeanean Phelps + Karen Hannon044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Hannon + Brooke Teefey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Teefey
102W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Kelley Glen
156W–87L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
Robin Oldt
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Crissy Poindexter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Karen Hannon
66W–116L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
Rosie Ortiz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Meaco Coffey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.