Teams

TCRC Otto

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Mon

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-25vs TDC SweeneyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniela Otto / Kristin Tetterton vs Irina Schaffernoth / Annmarie Lobred6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-10-18vs Westwood Payne / HassettWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Daniela Otto vs Laura Strickler / Laura Miller6-4, 6-4
2021-10-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesCam Nguyen / Marineth Kight vs Elizabeth Coleman / Rocio Rosa6-4, 6-2
2021-10-04vs MAC Ealey / McDonoughSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaniela Otto / Lara Green vs Katherine McDowell / Jamie Stokes6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVirginia Grigg / Marineth Kight vs Kaitlyn Mejia / Bernice White3-6, 6-7
2021-09-27vs HCC ManginSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLucinda Stuckey / Kristin Tetterton vs Pam Vossenberg / Sally Caldwell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarineth Kight / Anne Moore vs Thu-Hang Groome / Stephanie Yablonski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-09-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniela Otto / Lara Green vs Kathy Flowers / Susan Powell6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-09-13vs KRA Gerecke / OgilvieLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniela Otto / Kristin Tetterton vs Caroline Ogilvie / Lesley Terminella4-6, 2-6
2021-09-07vs Woodlake PhelpsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnne Moore / Marineth Kight vs Meaco Coffey / Crissy Poindexter6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Kristin Tetterton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Lara Green
published
3.56
Daniela Otto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Karen Devalk
published
3.29
Cam Nguyen
published 3.5
3.05
Marineth Kight
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Virginia Grigg
published
2.95
Angie Pearson
published 3.5
2.92
Katherine Mortimer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Green + Daniela Otto1437% games−8.8% vs expected
Daniela Otto + Kristin Tetterton134 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Grigg + Katherine Mortimer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Tetterton
155W–104L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Lara Green
11W–16L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Daniela Otto
117W–203L career · 5 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
Karen Devalk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Cam Nguyen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Marineth Kight
118W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.05
Virginia Grigg
2W–10L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Angie Pearson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.95
Katherine Mortimer
7W–21L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.