Teams

KRA Gerecke / Ogilvie

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Mon

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-01vs RMC FlowersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Shiveley / Caroline Ogilvie vs Jennifer Owens / Susan Powell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Fleck / Carlyle Walek vs Kerry Kablack / Megan Lloyd3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-10-13vs HCC ManginWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Lauren Hauk vs Susan Vonderlehr Nolan / Pam Vossenberg6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-12vs ACAC KrebsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaroline Ogilvie / Ellie StJohn vs Alcira Varela de Guzman / Nancy Jamer6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatherine Fleck / Sara Winterhoff vs Elizabeth Coleman / Patti Bryan5-7, 2-6
2021-10-11vs Woodlake PhelpsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Ellie StJohn vs Stacy Wiseman / Laura Kelly6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSara Winterhoff / Kerri Green vs Karen Hannon / Robin Oldt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Hauk / Lesley Terminella vs Sarah Capehart / Patrice Shupack6-4, 6-3
2021-09-20vs Westwood Payne / HassettLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllie StJohn / Lesley Terminella vs Anna Shea / Lauren Jones1-6, 3-6
2021-09-13vs TCRC OttoWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Ogilvie / Lesley Terminella vs Daniela Otto / Kristin Tetterton6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Shiveley / Lauren Hauk vs Angie Pearson / Katherine Mortimer6-1, 6-1
2021-09-07vs MAC Ealey / McDonoughWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Ellie StJohn vs Theresa Hughes / Jennifer Hughes6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Winterhoff / Katherine Fleck vs Kaitlyn Mejia / Bernice White7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Lauren Hauk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Katherine Shiveley
published
3.88
Emily Gravitt
published 4
3.80
Lesley Terminella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Katie Gerecke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Carlyle Walek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Caroline Ogilvie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Katherine Fleck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Annie Gushman
published 3.5
3.24
Sara Winterhoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Kerri Green
published
2.77
Heather DeBolt
published 3
Caroline Appich
published 3
2.73
Mandy Miller
published
Lisa Voeks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Fleck + Sara Winterhoff141645% games−2.9% vs expected
Caroline Ogilvie + Katie Gerecke4550% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Terminella + Lauren Hauk4157% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Terminella + Caroline Ogilvie404 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Terminella + Emily Gravitt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Hauk
67W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.22
Katherine Shiveley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Emily Gravitt
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.88
Lesley Terminella
135W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Katie Gerecke
110W–125L career · 3 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carlyle Walek
129W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Caroline Ogilvie
101W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
Katherine Fleck
65W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Annie Gushman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sara Winterhoff
99W–86L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Kerri Green
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Heather DeBolt
24W–32L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Caroline Appich
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mandy Miller
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Lisa Voeks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.