Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Woodbury

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.5W PM

19 players · average NTRP 4.45 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJanine Nesseth / Pamela Hofmann vs Emily Wallace / Lora Cobabe4-6, 2-6
2024-08-01vs Cottonwood Club-EischeidLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Phillips / Jane McQuade vs Jennifer Korb / Heather Foy6-3, 1-2
L#2 DoublesJen Dickey / Pamela Hofmann vs Laura Savage / Stephanie Tonin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesJane McQuade / Pamela Hofmann vs Lisa Sterbenz / Veronica O'Brien6-2, 6-4
2024-07-11vs Cottonwood Club-EischeidLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Jennifer Korb / Heidi Gordon7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJen Dickey / Paige Miller vs Kimberly Simpson / Christina Eischeid6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-29Won 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Miller / Jen Dickey vs Emily Wallace / Lora Cobabe3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Hofmann / Martsie Earl vs Michelle Moscon / Jennifer Rasmussen7-5, 6-2
2024-06-27Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Woolley / Jen Dickey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Phillips / Jane McQuade vs Teisa Linscott / Leslie Barrowes6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-13vs Cottonwood Club-EischeidWon 10
W#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Pamela Hofmann vs Arashan Heikkila / Kimberly Simpson6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Tracey Valentine / Sarah Blake1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Pamela Hofmann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.22
Lynette Duran
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Amy Woolley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
Cyndi Jones
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Jane McQuade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Meghan Clark
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.05
Sue Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Karina Herman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
4.03
Jen Dickey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.00
Paige Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.97
Michelle Porter
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.95
Jennifer Hathaway
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.94
Ann Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.91
Linda Marz
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.86
Cathy Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.61
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Janine Nesseth
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julie DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Martsie Earl
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane McQuade + Paige Miller7160% games+7.5% vs expected
Paige Miller + Pamela Hofmann6161% games+4.9% vs expected
Karina Herman + Amy Woolley321256% games+4.3% vs expected
Paige Miller + Jen Dickey11460% games+4.0% vs expected
Lynette Duran + Jennifer Hathaway12955% games+3.1% vs expected
Amy Woolley + Jen Dickey13556% games+2.1% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Pamela Hofmann6850% games+0.3% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Ann Phillips413154% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Pamela Hofmann
34W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Lynette Duran
186W–144L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Amy Woolley
192W–98L career · 10 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Cyndi Jones
154W–124L career · 10 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Jane McQuade
266W–179L career · 6 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
4.11
Meghan Clark
56W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Sue Curtis
49W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Karina Herman
63W–63L career · 8 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Jen Dickey
97W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Paige Miller
80W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
4.00
Michelle Porter
28W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.97
Jennifer Hathaway
65W–51L career · 7 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
4.5
Ann Phillips
59W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
4.5
Linda Marz
140W–118L career · 7 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
4.5
Cathy Davis
47W–78L career · 8 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.86
4
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
77W–136L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
Janine Nesseth
23W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie DeLong
70W–36L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martsie Earl
40W–47L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.