Teams

Smith 4.0 55 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs Dunbar 4.0 55 MonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynne Murray / Caroline McAlister vs Julianne Shamburg / Kari Craig6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Majestic / Aprille Black vs Cindy Thomas / Jane Bunemann6-4, 6-2
2023-04-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesCookie Guarini / Diane Majestic vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-17vs Manning 4.0 55 MonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynne Murray / Caroline McAlister vs Marianne Millikan / Kathryn Michaud6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarrie Ganim / Diane Majestic vs Margaret Reynolds / Mary Jane Tarver6-1, 6-1
2023-04-10vs Eagan/McElreath 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynne Murray / Caroline McAlister vs Suzanne Rudy / Chris Amos6-2, 6-3
2023-04-03vs McKenzie-Callaghan 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Majestic / Lynne Murray vs Amy Callaghan / Susan Calkins6-3, 6-0
2023-03-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesCaroline McAlister / Lynne Murray vs Kathy Brown / Ann Evans4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesLynne Murray / Caroline McAlister vs Sara Hamrick / Cindy Thomas6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Carrie Ganim
published 4
3.73
Lynne Murray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Carole Albright
published 4
3.70
Diane Majestic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Ann Morris
published 4
3.67
3.62
Tonya Lomas
published
3.38
Nancye Milam
published
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
3.10
Cookie Guarini
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Murray + Diane Majestic2452% gamesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Carrie Ganim404 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Caroline McAlister213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Ganim
24W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
Lynne Murray
161W–88L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carole Albright
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Diane Majestic
204W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Ann Morris
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Caroline McAlister
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Tonya Lomas
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
Nancye Milam
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cookie Guarini
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.