Teams

MIC 55+ 6.0 W

2026 55&Over Women · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-29vs ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Owens / Anne Hentschel vs Laura Beber / Maria Pedersen6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Sidari / Maura Semprevivo vs Tee Colangelo / Alicia Cintron0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Walsh / Suzanne Moncure vs Joan Stone / Caroline Eickelbeck1-6, 4-6
2026-07-22vs TCH Hot Shots 55+ 6.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Hentschel / Lisa Owens vs Catherine Mulhern / Janice Shepps6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNoreen Reilly-Lunstead / Jane Johnson vs Donna Kalin / Lisa Heinlein6-1, 6-2
2026-07-15vs RRC Serves You Right 55+ 6.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Johnson / Anne Hentschel vs Lillian Schulz / Laura Frase2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNoreen Reilly-Lunstead / Suzanne Moncure vs Lisa Chtioui / Andrea Mancini1-6, 0-6
2026-07-08vs Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Owens / Anne Hentschel vs Yvette Bayoumy / Laura Buck6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Kimmel / Angela Walsh vs Rachel Axinn / Hong Zhao1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Parks / Samantha Sidari vs Maureen Popp / Lora Zaretsky3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Hentschel / Jane Johnson vs Suzanne Millette / Sabrina Seidman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNoreen Reilly-Lunstead / Margaret Bagley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-17vs Willowbrook 55+ 6.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Owens / Anne Hentschel vs Allyson Davidov / Gita Kinney7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAngela Walsh / Jane Johnson vs Carol Walsh / Debra Zeifman1-6, 0-6
2026-06-08vs ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Hentschel / Samantha Sidari vs Angelika Leissl / Paula Park4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJane Johnson / Maura Semprevivo vs Joanne Rivers / Kristiane Tarantino4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNoreen Reilly-Lunstead / Margaret Bagley vs Monica Lynn / Adela Kahn1-6, 2-6
2026-05-27vs RRC Serves You Right 55+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Hentschel / Lisa Owens vs Lillian Schulz / Jill Hershaft3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane Johnson / Maura Semprevivo vs Dolores Principe Masino / Janice Cavatoni3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Walsh / Marcia Kimmel vs Lisa Chtioui / Mary Beth MacAulay2-6, 3-6
2026-05-18vs Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Owens / Anne Hentschel vs Mary Ellen Bruno / Rachel Axinn7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJane Johnson / Samantha Sidari vs Ann Castelli / Patricia Sullivan7-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMaura Semprevivo / Noreen Reilly-Lunstead vs Shang Guo / Hong Zhao1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Elizabeth Parks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Anne Hentschel
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.51
Samantha Sidari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Angela Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jane Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Katie Pagen
published
Lisa Owens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marcia Kimmel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Bagley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maura Semprevivo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Noreen Reilly-Lunstead
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sheryl Appleyard
published
Suzanne Moncure
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Hentschel + Lisa Owens5157% gamesnot enough data
Jane Johnson + Maura Semprevivo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Parks
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Anne Hentschel
13W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Samantha Sidari
38W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Angela Walsh
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.34
Jane Johnson
15W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Pagen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Owens
7W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcia Kimmel
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Bagley
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maura Semprevivo
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Noreen Reilly-Lunstead
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheryl Appleyard
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Moncure
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.