Teams

TCH Hot Shots 55+ 6.0W

2026 55&Over Women · 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 2.81 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-05vs Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Jennifer Ringstad vs Ann Castelli / Laura Buck2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Listerman / Teresa Pereira vs Diane Weidenbaum / Maureen Strong4-6, 3-1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Teresa Pereira vs Suzanne Millette / Anne Marie Norberto4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Heinlein / Donna Kalin vs Amy Kelley / Lora Zaretsky3-6, 2-6
2026-07-22vs MIC 55+ 6.0 WLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Janice Shepps vs Anne Hentschel / Lisa Owens2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Kalin / Lisa Heinlein vs Noreen Reilly-Lunstead / Jane Johnson1-6, 2-6
2026-07-08vs ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanice Shepps / Jennifer Ringstad vs Laura Beber / Felisse Starker7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra de Novellis / Lisa Heinlein vs Amy Tuller / Marion Ferraro3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Condon / Kathy Martin vs Caroline Eickelbeck / Joan Stone2-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs RRC Serves You Right 55+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Maud Tucker vs Lillian Schulz / Laura Frase0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Anne Young vs Jill Hershaft / Elizabeth Hartman0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLisa Heinlein / Andrea Condon vs Caroline Scully / Karen Keane4-6, 1-6
2026-06-18vs Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Amy Listerman vs Rachel Axinn / Patricia Sullivan0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSandra de Novellis / Lisa Heinlein vs Cathy Cuozzo / Joyce Patone6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdriana Agdamus / Andrea Condon vs Thuy Tran-Quinn / Diane Weidenbaum1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Maud Tucker vs Sabrina Seidman / Suzanne Millette6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Young / Jennifer Ringstad vs Amy Kelley / Lora Zaretsky7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Listerman / Lisa Heinlein vs Iris Glass / Amy Hollander4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-04vs Willowbrook 55+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Jennifer Ringstad vs Patricia Robbins / Gita Kinney4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Listerman / Teresa Pereira vs Gladys DiSisto / Teresa Duguet1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Troy / Sandra de Novellis vs Tina Palmieri / Chris Gallagher4-6, 4-6
2026-05-27vs Willowbrook 55+ 6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Listerman / Janice Shepps vs Beth Jacobson / Jane Shelton2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Kalin / Judith Hirsch vs Chris Gallagher / Teresa Duguet4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Martin / Andrea Condon vs Karen Parish / Tina Palmieri2-6, 4-6
2026-05-20vs ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Young / Maud Tucker vs Maria Pedersen / Robyn Cameron0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Hirsch / Janice Shepps vs Marion Ferraro / Diana Cunningham0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Troy / Andrea Condon vs Adela Kahn / Tee Colangelo0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Sandra de Novellis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Catherine Mulhern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Adriana Agdamus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Anne Young
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Janice Shepps
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Amy Listerman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.27
Judith Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Lisa Heinlein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
Carol Troy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Andrea Condon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Donna Kalin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jennifer Ringstad
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kathy Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Schneider
published
Maud Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Pereira
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Hirsch + Catherine Mulhern5250% games+1.3% vs expected
Janice Shepps + Catherine Mulhern201351% games−3.0% vs expected
Adriana Agdamus + Amy Listerman2729% games−6.7% vs expected
Lisa Heinlein + Sandra de Novellis2537% games−7.3% vs expected
Maud Tucker + Anne Young8846% gamesnot enough data
Anne Young + Jennifer Ringstad7652% gamesnot enough data
Maud Tucker + Catherine Mulhern4646% gamesnot enough data
Donna Kalin + Jennifer Ringstad4549% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra de Novellis
13W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Catherine Mulhern
65W–54L career · 7 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Adriana Agdamus
17W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Anne Young
24W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Janice Shepps
43W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Amy Listerman
41W–90L career · 5 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Judith Hirsch
13W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.27
2.5
Lisa Heinlein
14W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Carol Troy
7W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Andrea Condon
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Donna Kalin
41W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Ringstad
22W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Martin
21W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Schneider
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maud Tucker
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Pereira
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.