Teams

RRC Serves You Right 55+ 6.0W

2026 55&Over Women · 6.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-30vs ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Hershaft / Laura Frase vs Tee Colangelo / Maria Pedersen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hartman / Caroline Scully vs Diana Cunningham / Angelika Leissl5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Dolores Principe Masino vs Laura Beber / Felisse Starker7-6, 6-3
2026-07-29vs Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Frase / Lillian Schulz vs Patricia Sullivan / Yvette Bayoumy5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Cashman / Susan Nask vs Diana Mullen / Catherine Traynor7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Chtioui / Karen Moriarty vs Shang Guo / Hong Zhao6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLillian Schulz / Elizabeth Hartman vs Amy Kelley / Tracy Nichols6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Chtioui / Andrea Mancini vs Suzanne Millette / Anne Marie Norberto2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Holder / Rima Garrow vs Francesca Rossi / Amy Hollander6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-15vs MIC 55+ 6.0 WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLillian Schulz / Laura Frase vs Jane Johnson / Anne Hentschel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Chtioui / Andrea Mancini vs Noreen Reilly-Lunstead / Suzanne Moncure6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Keane / Carolyn Lao vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Willowbrook 55+ 6.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Frase / Lillian Schulz vs Gina Sassano / Nona Ullman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hartman / Caroline Scully vs Beth Jacobson / Patricia Robbins6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Nask / Mary Beth MacAulay vs Teresa Duguet / Debra Zeifman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-22vs TCH Hot Shots 55+ 6.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLillian Schulz / Laura Frase vs Catherine Mulhern / Maud Tucker6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Hershaft / Elizabeth Hartman vs Jennifer Ringstad / Anne Young6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCaroline Scully / Karen Keane vs Lisa Heinlein / Andrea Condon6-4, 6-1
2026-06-10vs Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLillian Schulz / Laura Frase vs Patricia Sullivan / Catherine Traynor6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMary Kentros / Diane Cashman vs Ann Castelli / Diana Mullen6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Lao / Karen Moriarty vs Karin Cabral / Maureen Strong1-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesLillian Schulz / Susan Nask vs Anne Marie Norberto / Francesca Rossi7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCaroline Scully / Elizabeth Hartman vs Liz Joline / Tracy Nichols6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRima Garrow / Renee Holder vs Suzanne Millette / Maureen Popp6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-27vs MIC 55+ 6.0 WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLillian Schulz / Jill Hershaft vs Anne Hentschel / Lisa Owens6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDolores Principe Masino / Janice Cavatoni vs Jane Johnson / Maura Semprevivo6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Chtioui / Mary Beth MacAulay vs Angela Walsh / Marcia Kimmel6-2, 6-3
2026-05-20vs Willowbrook 55+ 6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLillian Schulz / Susan Nask vs Gladys DiSisto / Teresa Duguet6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDolores Principe Masino / Janice Cavatoni vs Nona Ullman / Carol Walsh6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Kentros / Caroline Scully vs Tina Palmieri / Karen Parish6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Janice Cavatoni
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Andrea Mancini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Moriarty
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Laura Frase
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.93
Lillian Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Karen Keane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Susan Nask
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Caroline Scully
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Jill Hershaft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Elizabeth Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Diane Cashman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Lisa Chtioui
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Mary Beth MacAulay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Mary Kentros
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.27
Dolores Principe Masino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Janice Holderman
published 2.5
2.25
Carolyn Lao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Rima Garrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Holder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Frase + Karen Moriarty7255% games+7.9% vs expected
Karen Moriarty + Susan Nask2547% games+6.6% vs expected
Laura Frase + Lillian Schulz15555% games+3.8% vs expected
Andrea Mancini + Karen Moriarty3351% games+3.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Hartman + Dolores Principe Masino6257% games−0.9% vs expected
Lillian Schulz + Karen Moriarty131155% games−1.3% vs expected
Mary Kentros + Dolores Principe Masino121148% games−3.2% vs expected
Janice Cavatoni + Karen Moriarty9547% games−4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janice Cavatoni
227W–104L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Andrea Mancini
155W–124L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Karen Moriarty
181W–179L career · 7 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Laura Frase
140W–117L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Lillian Schulz
122W–89L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
Karen Keane
43W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Susan Nask
92W–91L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Caroline Scully
35W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Jill Hershaft
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Elizabeth Hartman
40W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Diane Cashman
59W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Lisa Chtioui
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Mary Beth MacAulay
44W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Mary Kentros
64W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Dolores Principe Masino
146W–140L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Janice Holderman
14W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Carolyn Lao
58W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Rima Garrow
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Renee Holder
33W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.