Teams

Piedmont - Singles 40s 4.0M Tues

2024 Piedmont Singles 40 & Over · 4.0 Men Tues PM Singles

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Tues PM Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Arnold Schiffman
published 4
3.67
John Rodenbough
published
3.58
Huy Ho
published
3.52
Robert Wells
published
3.46
Scott Wallace
published
3.46
Robert Lynch
published
3.21
Tan Ren
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arnold Schiffman
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
John Rodenbough
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Huy Ho
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Robert Wells
9W–24L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Scott Wallace
15W–32L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
Robert Lynch
16W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Tan Ren
20W–35L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.