Teams

Brandkamp

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.5 Women 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-26vs Nerell SeidelLost 12
L#1 SinglesAutumn Correnti vs Madison Seidel4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJulia Griffin vs Kelly Nerell1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesLeigh Burris vs Sara Fagel6-1, 6-2
2025-02-23vs Waddle 3.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesAutumn Correnti vs Katie Greene5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJulia Griffin vs Julia Mattingly5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesStephanie Farrell vs Molly Hanly6-3, 6-0
2025-02-08vs Capobianco CFCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesPati DeOliva vs Madeleine Clark2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAmy Messier vs Kimberly Shipley6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesStephanie Farrell vs Hayden Kirby6-2, 6-1
2025-02-06vs Waddle 3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesAutumn Correnti vs Julia Mattingly6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPati DeOliva vs Nicole Slocumb1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKathleen Graeser vs Taylor Waddle1-6, 1-6
2025-01-29vs Nerell SeidelLost 03
L#1 SinglesAutumn Correnti vs Meg Crenshaw2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJulia Griffin vs Stacie Williams6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLisa Brandkamp vs Abigail Hoh3-6, 4-6
2025-01-13vs Capobianco CFCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesStephanie Farrell vs Lorien Lamar1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLeigh Burris vs Sarah McLamb3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesKathleen Graeser vs Denise Lopatka3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Amy Messier
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Julia Griffin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Stephanie Farrell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.36
Lisa Brandkamp
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Leigh Burris
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Kathleen Graeser
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Autumn Correnti
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Pati DeOliva
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Burris + Autumn Correnti123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Brandkamp + Julia Griffin303 matchesnot enough data
Julia Griffin + Amy Messier303 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Graeser + Stephanie Farrell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Messier
40W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Julia Griffin
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Stephanie Farrell
43W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
Lisa Brandkamp
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Leigh Burris
53W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kathleen Graeser
41W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Autumn Correnti
14W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Pati DeOliva
27W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.