Teams

Nerell Seidel

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.5 Women 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-26vs BrandkampWon 21
W#1 SinglesMadison Seidel vs Autumn Correnti6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Nerell vs Julia Griffin6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesSara Fagel vs Leigh Burris1-6, 2-6
2025-02-22vs Waddle 3.5 SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesMadison Seidel vs Heather Weddle6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAbigail Hoh vs Julia Mattingly4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesCorinne Monahan vs Taylor Waddle2-6, 1-6
2025-02-17vs Capobianco CFCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesMadison Seidel vs Lorien Lamar6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKelly Nerell vs Denise Lopatka6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesStacie Williams vs Madeleine Clark0-6, 5-7
2025-02-14vs Branco 18Won 21
W#1 SinglesAbigail Hoh vs Darcy Burgard6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSara Fagel vs Christine Branco1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesChristine Pratt vs Kelsie Cappetta2-6, 0-6
2025-02-03vs Waddle 3.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesMadison Seidel vs Nicole Slocumb6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMeg Crenshaw vs Julia Mattingly1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAbigail Hoh vs Meghan McKeithan6-2, 7-5
2025-01-29vs BrandkampWon 30
W#1 SinglesMeg Crenshaw vs Autumn Correnti6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStacie Williams vs Julia Griffin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAbigail Hoh vs Lisa Brandkamp6-3, 6-4
2025-01-25vs Capobianco CFCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesCorinne Monahan vs Kristine Janik7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKelly Nerell vs Kelly Capobianco4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesChristine Pratt vs Hayden Kirby2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-01-13vs Branco 18Lost 12
W#1 SinglesMeg Crenshaw vs Elizabeth Smith6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStacie Williams vs Darcy Burgard6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSara Fagel vs Katherine Sullivan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Madison Seidel
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
3.40
Abigail Hoh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Kelly Nerell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Stacie Williams
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.24
Corinne Monahan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Christine Pratt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.73
Sara Fagel
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Meg Crenshaw
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Seidel
52W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Abigail Hoh
40W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kelly Nerell
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Stacie Williams
39W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Corinne Monahan
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Christine Pratt
5W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Sara Fagel
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Meg Crenshaw
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.