Teams

Waddle 3.5 Singles

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.5 Women 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-26vs Capobianco CFCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesMaddie Crumpton vs Madeleine Clark6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesHeather Weddle vs Sarah Beth Deans3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMeghan McKeithan vs Kimberly Shipley2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-23vs BrandkampSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJulia Mattingly vs Julia Griffin7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMolly Hanly vs Stephanie Farrell3-6, 0-6
2025-02-22vs Nerell SeidelWon 21
L#1 SinglesHeather Weddle vs Madison Seidel2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJulia Mattingly vs Abigail Hoh6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTaylor Waddle vs Corinne Monahan6-2, 6-1
2025-02-17vs Branco 18Won 21
W#1 SinglesTaylor Waddle vs Kelsie Cappetta6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Weddle vs Betty Schedler6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMolly Hanly vs Darcy Burgard2-6, 3-6
2025-02-06vs BrandkampWon 30
W#1 SinglesJulia Mattingly vs Autumn Correnti7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNicole Slocumb vs Pati DeOliva6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTaylor Waddle vs Kathleen Graeser6-1, 6-1
2025-02-03vs Branco 18Won 30
W#1 SinglesNicole Slocumb vs Christine Branco6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHeather Weddle vs Elizabeth Smith6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMeghan McKeithan vs Katherine Sullivan6-1, 7-5
2025-02-03vs Nerell SeidelLost 12
L#1 SinglesNicole Slocumb vs Madison Seidel2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJulia Mattingly vs Meg Crenshaw6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesMeghan McKeithan vs Abigail Hoh2-6, 5-7
2025-01-29vs Capobianco CFCCWon 20
W#2 SinglesMaddie Crumpton vs Kelly Capobianco3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMolly Hanly vs Kimberly Shipley7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Taylor Waddle
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.58
Maddie Crumpton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.57
Nicole Slocumb
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.51
Julia Mattingly
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.15
Heather Weddle
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Meghan McKeithan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Molly Hanly
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Weddle + Julia Mattingly3357% games+5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Waddle
40W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Maddie Crumpton
28W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Nicole Slocumb
56W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Julia Mattingly
59W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Heather Weddle
31W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Meghan McKeithan
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Molly Hanly
18W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.