Teams

Chung - Triple Threat

2025 Howard Tri-Level · Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.30 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-14vs LaMoure - TrianglesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Steffen / Karen Jones vs Amy LaMoure / Jill Rose6-7, 4-5
W#3 DoublesChristine Twele / Karen Altman vs Anne McKissick / Ellen Buckley6-3, 6-1
2025-08-06vs String Theory (Quinlan)Won 30
W#1 DoublesWenxi Li / Kim Steffen vs Colleen Knapp / Chanpen Teeranon6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Elvira McCullough vs Casey Royster / Mihaela Pertea6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLena Brandenburg / Christine Twele vs Wendy Hubbert / Jessica Myers6-7, 6-4
2025-08-04vs Tetrault - Invisible sTRIngsLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Twele / Elizabeth McLeod vs Kathryn Painter / Jennifer Sinkule1-6, 0-6
2025-07-30vs Hauswirth - Ball BustersLost 02
L#2 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / GENA CHUNG vs Marina Goncharuk / Julie Edwards3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Twele / Elizabeth McLeod vs Stephanie Heinrichs / Julie Cabaniss5-7, 1-6
2025-07-17vs Phan - Kicking AcesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Elvira McCullough vs Andrea Judd / Pamela KANSTOROOM6-3, 5-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Altman / Julie Chrisco Andrews vs Jillian Kingwood / Tammara Peyton2-6, 2-6
2025-06-26vs LaMoure - TrianglesLost 02
L#2 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Jessica Thompson vs Julie Snavely / Becky Ronayne3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Preissler / Lena Brandenburg vs Kathleen Stevens / Michele Barron1-6, 4-6
2025-06-20vs Tetrault - Invisible sTRIngsLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Altman / Lena Brandenburg vs Kathryn Painter / Maria Haslbeck3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-03vs Hauswirth - Ball BustersWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth McLeod / Julie Chrisco Andrews vs Julie Cabaniss / Stephanie Heinrichs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-31vs Phan - Kicking AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesLindsay Preissler / Elizabeth McLeod vs Jillian Kingwood / Tammara Peyton2-6, 3-6
2025-05-29vs String Theory (Quinlan)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLena Brandenburg / Julie Chrisco Andrews vs Laura Lewandowski / Emily Trochimowicz3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.77
Wenxi Li
published
3.71
Michele Bloom
published
3.70
Kim Steffen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Sanghee Lee
published
3.44
Elvira McCullough
published 3.5
3.27
GENA CHUNG
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Roshni Fifadra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Lena Brandenburg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.09
Karen Altman
published
3.07
Elizabeth Amerault
published 3.5
3.06
Sandy Friedman
published
2.92
Julie Chrisco Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Christine Twele
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Elizabeth McLeod
published 3
2.79
Lindsay Preissler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lena Brandenburg + Lindsay Preissler5358% games+7.9% vs expected
Lindsay Preissler + Roshni Fifadra314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Sanghee Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Wenxi Li
29W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Michele Bloom
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Kim Steffen
115W–95L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Sanghee Lee
38W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Elvira McCullough
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–132L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Roshni Fifadra
129W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3
Lena Brandenburg
93W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.16
Karen Altman
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Elizabeth Amerault
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.07
Sandy Friedman
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Julie Chrisco Andrews
155W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Christine Twele
85W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Elizabeth McLeod
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Lindsay Preissler
97W–96L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.