Teams

Tetrault - Invisible sTRIngs

2025 Howard Tri-Level · Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.85 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-04vs Chung - Triple ThreatWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Painter / Jennifer Sinkule vs Christine Twele / Elizabeth McLeod6-1, 6-0
2025-07-30vs String Theory (Quinlan)Won 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Ioannou / Kate Dempsey vs Chanpen Teeranon / Casey Royster6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathryn Painter / Maria Haslbeck vs Mihaela Pertea / Wendy Hubbert6-1, 6-2
2025-07-17vs LaMoure - TrianglesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sinkule / Kathryn Painter vs Kathleen Stevens / Michele Barron7-6, 6-0
2025-07-01vs Phan - Kicking AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Mathis / Kathryn Painter vs Heather FREIDKIN / Tammara Peyton6-2, 6-4
2025-06-26vs Hauswirth - Ball BustersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Dempsey / Joan Garlow vs Madison Simmons / Quynh Tran4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAllison Mathis / Jennifer Sinkule vs Meghan Leimenstoll / Julie Cabaniss6-1, 7-5
2025-06-20vs Chung - Triple ThreatWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Painter / Maria Haslbeck vs Karen Altman / Lena Brandenburg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-03vs String Theory (Quinlan)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Steinberg / Joan Garlow vs Chanpen Teeranon / Joan Ray6-2, 6-1
2025-05-31vs LaMoure - TrianglesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Garlow / Christine Ioannou vs Amy LaMoure / Jill Rose7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sinkule / Julie Pistorio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-16vs Phan - Kicking AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoan Garlow / Katie Tetrault vs Kristine Chesney / Virginia Fung2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Haslbeck / Allison Mathis vs Jillian Kingwood / Tammara Peyton3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Beth Steinberg
published 4.5
3.92
Katherine Fluharty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Joan Garlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Christine Ioannou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Katie Tetrault
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.73
Kate Dempsey
published
3.72
Jennifer Exelby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Meaghan Williams
published
3.62
Tricia Muneses
published
3.40
Jennifer Sinkule
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Kathryn Painter
published
3.29
Allison Mathis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Maria Haslbeck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Andrea Burkert
published 3.5
2.97
Julie Pistorio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Mathis + Maria Haslbeck8358% games+9.0% vs expected
Katie Tetrault + Jennifer Exelby6353% games+8.4% vs expected
Allison Mathis + Kathryn Painter5751% games−0.9% vs expected
Kathryn Painter + Jennifer Sinkule224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Steinberg
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Katherine Fluharty
121W–59L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Joan Garlow
156W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Christine Ioannou
152W–115L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Katie Tetrault
144W–98L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Kate Dempsey
31W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jennifer Exelby
95W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Meaghan Williams
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.71
Tricia Muneses
45W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Jennifer Sinkule
40W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kathryn Painter
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Allison Mathis
73W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Maria Haslbeck
43W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Andrea Burkert
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Julie Pistorio
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.