Teams

Martin NC 4.0+W

2025 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 4.0+ Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-02vs Alford NC 4.0+WWon 21
L#1 SinglesCaitlin Thomas vs Nelli Golmeeva2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKristi McCrory vs Ally Boggan6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHolly Bigham vs Mandy Alford6-3, 6-3
2025-03-01vs James NE 4.0+WLost 02
L#1 SinglesMary-Sada Foster vs Suzanne Cervantes7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHolly Bigham vs Kelly Young1-6, 3-6
2025-03-01vs Stone NE 4.0+WWon 21
L#1 SinglesKristi McCrory vs Dana Bray3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCaitlin Thomas vs Hannah Grimes7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHolly Bigham vs Ashley Roberson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0+ Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Caitlin Thomas
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.17
Holly Bigham
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Kristi McCrory
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Mary-Sada Foster
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caitlin Thomas
25W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Holly Bigham
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Kristi McCrory
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Sada Foster
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.