Teams

James NE 4.0+W

2025 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 4.0+ Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-02vs Stone NE 4.0+WSplit 11
W#2 SinglesDanielle Arnsdorff vs Leanne Pounders6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKelly Young vs Amanda Howell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Martin NC 4.0+WWon 30
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Cervantes vs Mary-Sada Foster6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelly Young vs Holly Bigham6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJudy Bumgardner vs Penny Martin6-2, 7-5
2025-03-01vs Alford NC 4.0+WWon 21
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Cervantes vs Jess Flanders6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDanielle Arnsdorff vs Ally Boggan6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJudy Bumgardner vs Mandy Alford6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-28vs Stone NE 4.0+WLost 12
L#1 SinglesDanielle Arnsdorff vs Dana Bray1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJudy Bumgardner vs Leanne Pounders4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKelly Young vs Amanda Howell6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0+ Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1James NE 4.0+W3184991
2Martin NC 4.0+W21451083
3Stone NE 4.0+W226613104
4To Be Determined000000
5Alford NC 4.0+W03361391

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kelly Young
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.55
Suzanne Cervantes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.54
Danielle Arnsdorff
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.45
Judy Bumgardner
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Young
68W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Suzanne Cervantes
74W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
4
Danielle Arnsdorff
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Judy Bumgardner
20W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.