← Teams

MAC-Ogden

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Annie Duong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
—
Benjamin Yang
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.24
Bryan Ward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Mariniah Prendergast
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Christie Post
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Christopher Haddon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.95
Amy Leahy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Doug Post
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Damon Ogden
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
Results8 ties
2019-03-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAmy Leahy / Brian Leahy vs Frank Collie / Kerstin Anderson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBryan Ward / Mary Jo Kallgren vs Chris Fahlbusch / Kirsten Ruchaber6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDamon Ogden / Annie Duong vs Nathan Austin / Cathrine Olander6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2019-03-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Yang / Annie Duong vs David Finkelman / Janelle Laurila6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristie Post / Doug Post vs Leslie Ballard / Brian Hendrickson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Kallgren / Bryan Ward vs Ry Koteen / Donna Roisom7-5, 6-3
2019-03-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBrian Leahy / Amy Leahy vs Kim Gowie / Bruce Levelle6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Haddon / Mary Jo Kallgren vs Julian Evola / Alison Marsh Harrison6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Yang / Mariniah Prendergast vs Jenna Hayes / Michael Skillman6-1, 6-2
2019-02-24Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesChristopher Haddon / Mary Jo Kallgren vs Jeanne-Sarah DeLarquier / Matthew Condit6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDoug Post / Christie Post vs Michelle Mehr / Todd Kuribayashi6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Leahy / Brian Leahy vs Dyllan Fitzgerald / Mary Klinger7-5, 6-4
2019-02-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Yang / Annie Duong vs Steve Fogg / Lisa Gray6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDoug Post / Christie Post vs Jeffrey Hunt / Tanya O'Neil6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBryan Ward / Mary Jo Kallgren vs Brian Dehen / Carol Woolman6-4, 6-0
2019-01-28Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAndrew Nilsson / Annie Duong vs Ke Ounaphom / Heidi Affentranger6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Yang / Mary Jo Kallgren vs June Wu / Michael Yee6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDamon Ogden / Amy Leahy vs Shannon DeVall / Bruce Herkamp6-1, 6-3
2019-01-18Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Haddon / Annie Duong vs Sekona Taufa / Minou Chau6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Yang / Mariniah Prendergast vs Jeff Berman / Bronwen Hager5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2019-01-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBryan Ward / Mary Jo Kallgren vs Adam Rothert / Donna Roisom6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFrank Lippy / Mariniah Prendergast vs David Sacks / Tracy Bardell7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnie Duong / Christopher Haddon vs Brian Hendrickson / Kelcey Brown6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Annie Duong
120W–52L career
0%69%31%
4.46
4.5
Benjamin Yang
67W–54L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Bryan Ward
36W–15L career
0%99%1%
4.24
4.5
Mariniah Prendergast
52W–33L career
3%96%0%
4.13
4.5
Christie Post
29W–26L career
9%91%0%
4.04
4.5
Christopher Haddon
39W–77L career
25%75%0%
3.96
4.5
Amy Leahy
73W–57L career
27%73%0%
3.95
4
Doug Post
79W–40L career
0%98%1%
3.81
4
Damon Ogden
87W–84L career
2%98%0%
3.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.