Teams

OC Team Courage - Nisha - Sun9

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 4.0W

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 SinglesSabrina MacLachlan vs Martha Cordova6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Vivian Ly6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEnam Bakr vs Lana Dalley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDaniela Schardinger vs Athena Wong6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAlicia Carlin vs Annette Tran6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEnam Bakr vs Kayla Friedland0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDaniela Schardinger vs Megan Osborn6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesShiva Shokouhi vs Eunice Han6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Randi Lloyd6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Rebecca Ginsburg6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDaniela Schardinger vs Genesis Arreola3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLuna Qingyue Cai vs Megan Osborn7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLindsay Miller vs Ames Blas6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniela Schardinger vs Gia Bao Le7-6, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAlicia Carlin vs Jazmin Rubio6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNisha Anish vs Randi Lloyd2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEnam Bakr vs Azin Mirchi6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDaniela Schardinger vs Gladys Tan6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAlicia Carlin vs Sabrina Wedge6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.91
Alicia Carlin
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.84
Luna Qingyue Cai
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.83
Daniela Schardinger
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.80
Enam Bakr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Monica Anderson
published
3.53
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Nisha Anish
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Shiva Shokouhi
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Lindsay Miller
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shiva Shokouhi + Gretchen Cuzick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Petrovacki
134W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Alicia Carlin
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.91
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Daniela Schardinger
22W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Enam Bakr
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Monica Anderson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Lindsay Miller
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.