Teams

2022 Tri Level Men's 40 - Heriberto Caldero

2022 Tri Level 40 & Over · 2022 Tri Level Mens 40

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesJavier Moreno / Jose Santiago vs Juan Guzman / Gabriel Llanos6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoel Melendez / Jaime Melendez Ayala vs Manuel Lemus Melendez / Manuel Principe Acosta4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJoaquin Quinoy / Heriberto Caldero vs Juan Santillan / Angel Hernandez6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesXavier Rosario / Jose Sierra-Pagan vs Heriberto Flores / Oscar Velez3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Perazza / Javier Moreno vs Jorge Reyes Otero / Jose Ortuzar6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesHeriberto Caldero / Edwin Ramos vs Eric Halais / Elvin Rodriguez6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoel Melendez / Jaime Melendez Ayala vs Alejandro Rivera Pagan / Luis Melendez-Fox2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVictor Tirado / Jose Santiago vs Cesar Negron / Rafael Vazquez Paniagua6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Tri Level Mens 40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Heriberto Caldero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Edwin Ramos
published 4
3.67
Joaquin Quinoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Oscar Ramon Cruz
published
3.38
Jose Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Javier Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Victor Tirado
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
3.13
Xavier Rosario
published
3.10
John Perazza
published
3.08
Jose Sierra-Pagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Joel Melendez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victor Tirado + Jose Santiago442256% games+5.8% vs expected
Heriberto Caldero + Joaquin Quinoy9261% games+1.8% vs expected
Jose Sierra-Pagan + Joel Melendez4251% gamesnot enough data
Jaime Melendez Ayala + Jose Santiago4153% gamesnot enough data
Jose Sierra-Pagan + Xavier Rosario134 matchesnot enough data
Jose Sierra-Pagan + John Perazza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heriberto Caldero
102W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Edwin Ramos
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Joaquin Quinoy
107W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Oscar Ramon Cruz
58W–54L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jose Santiago
149W–107L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Javier Moreno
169W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Victor Tirado
100W–95L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Jaime Melendez Ayala
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Xavier Rosario
22W–22L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
John Perazza
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jose Sierra-Pagan
47W–57L career · 1 line in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Joel Melendez
47W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.