Teams

Strung Out 7.5

2025 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.68 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-17vs Life TimeLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Justin Endow vs Katheryn Burriesci / Mark Burriesci6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-15vs TenniscitySplit 11
L#1 DoublesBryan Escobedo / Lauren Noonan vs Nathan Hines / Nancy Mallory1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVanessa Schulte / Joshua Cramer vs Evelina Juchneviciute / Ryan Cook7-6, 7-6
2025-09-10vs Mister and Miss HitsWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Justin Endow vs Danielle Stoddard / ChaiHuat Chong6-1, 6-1
2025-09-08vs ColdplayLost 02
L#1 DoublesJustin Endow / Barbara Beagles vs Winfield Jones / Caitlin Bower6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Davin Hanson / Emily Smith vs Jason Adkins / Leila Adkins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-27vs Backhanded ComplmentsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Noonan / Bryan Escobedo vs Emily Flores / Duncan Mitchell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoshua Cramer / Barbara Beagles vs Wallace Eastwood / Julia Garofalo2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Davin Hanson / Courtney Sticka vs Alison Powers / Miles Brown6-7, 3-6
2025-08-25vs Domin-AsiansLost 02
L#2 DoublesCourtney Sticka / Michael Davin Hanson vs Kathleen Barr / David Umberger6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Smith / Darron Peterson vs Katie Laws / Willie Lafrades5-7, 1-6
2025-08-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoshua Cramer / Amy Hanson vs Rick Roby / Chelsey Melby1-6, 1-6
2025-08-18vs Deuce DynastySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoshua Cramer / Barbara Beagles vs Jake Putnam / Nancy Edwards6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Smith / Michael Davin Hanson vs Christa Patton / Jon Hancock6-4, 6-2
2025-08-11vs Game, Set, Double ShotWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoshua Cramer / Amy Hanson vs Ethan Cooper / Emily Sloop6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tenniscity13239621320
2Tap Dat Ace123341128315
3WTF 2025114311439355
4Backhanded Complments114291641377
5The Mixfits114271848406
6Loose Strings96271843389
7Strung Out 7.587232251411
8Coldplay87232255432
9Life Time78212452408
10Trouble with Sets510222353419
11Deuce Dynasty312162964456
12Mister and Miss Hits312123369485
13Fuzzy Balls21383777497
14Game, Set, Double Shot11463981519

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Justin Endow
published 4
3.80
Jayme Sullivan
published 4
3.75
Bryan Escobedo
published 4
3.72
Courtney Sticka
published 4
3.54
Adair Holden
published 3.5
3.45
Micah Vogt
published 3.5
3.35
Vanessa Schulte
published 3.5
3.30
Michael Davin Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Daniel Glynn
published 3.5
Darron Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Amy Hanson
published 3.5
3.15
Barbara Beagles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Joshua Cramer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lauren Noonan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Davin Hanson + Amy Hanson81149% games+4.2% vs expected
Bryan Escobedo + Adair Holden5156% games+1.7% vs expected
Jayme Sullivan + Justin Endow4347% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beagles + Justin Endow2457% gamesnot enough data
Amy Hanson + Joshua Cramer4250% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Sticka + Micah Vogt4154% gamesnot enough data
Jayme Sullivan + Daniel Glynn2348% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Sticka + Michael Davin Hanson044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Justin Endow
147W–88L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Jayme Sullivan
49W–57L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Bryan Escobedo
88W–69L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Courtney Sticka
85W–69L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Adair Holden
127W–71L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Micah Vogt
78W–60L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Vanessa Schulte
106W–97L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Michael Davin Hanson
39W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Daniel Glynn
7W–12L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Darron Peterson
14W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amy Hanson
107W–63L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Barbara Beagles
34W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Joshua Cramer
28W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Noonan
48W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.