Teams

WTF 2025

2025 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 3.81 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tenniscity13239621320
2Tap Dat Ace123341128315
3WTF 2025114311439355
4Backhanded Complments114291641377
5The Mixfits114271848406
6Loose Strings96271843389
7Strung Out 7.587232251411
8Coldplay87232255432
9Life Time78212452408
10Trouble with Sets510222353419
11Deuce Dynasty312162964456
12Mister and Miss Hits312123369485
13Fuzzy Balls21383777497
14Game, Set, Double Shot11463981519

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Matt Rezendes
published 4.5
3.87
Kelley Canning
published 4
3.81
3.81
Timothy Brown
published 4
3.77
Karl Baughman
published 4
3.75
Paula Lawson
published 4
3.74
Kirk Porritt
published 4
3.71
Jeremy Canning
published 4
3.65
Eric Hallingstad
published 3.5
3.61
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.54
Andrew Bidou
published 3.5
3.45
Jim Brigham
published 3.5
3.39
James Mertz
published 3.5
3.38
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.35
Kimberlee Megale
published 3.5
3.24
Marnie Newton
published 3.5
3.17
Paige Brown
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Brown + Paige Brown21566% games+14.7% vs expected
Colleen Schoeck + Matt Rezendes5169% games+8.4% vs expected
Kelley Canning + Kirk Porritt9754% games+5.8% vs expected
Zel Mertz + Karl Baughman6356% games+1.6% vs expected
Zel Mertz + James Mertz271058% games+0.1% vs expected
Kelley Canning + Timothy Brown5258% games−0.8% vs expected
Zel Mertz + Matt Rezendes4150% games−3.7% vs expected
Kelley Canning + Jeremy Canning21039% games−17.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Matt Rezendes
84W–65L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
4
Kelley Canning
163W–107L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Lisa Trujillo-Dunn
188W–131L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Timothy Brown
171W–117L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Karl Baughman
159W–90L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Patricia Gastanaga
71W–34L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Kirk Porritt
221W–135L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Jeremy Canning
164W–151L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Eric Hallingstad
145W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.65
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–66L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Andrew Bidou
106W–61L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Jim Brigham
194W–84L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
James Mertz
187W–123L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Zel Mertz
310W–181L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Kimberlee Megale
183W–106L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Marnie Newton
214W–184L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Paige Brown
83W–64L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.