Teams

Reid/HCP/Foothills

2025 Foothills Singles 18 & over · 3.5 Singles Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-02vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTaylor Austin vs Jill Reese4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMindy Murray vs Lydia Sanders4-6, 0-6
2025-08-28vs Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Kristine Hutton6-3, 6-3
2025-08-14vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 SinglesAna Paula Schweitzer vs Maile Kim3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-07vs Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Tisha Zagaroli4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAna Paula Schweitzer vs Ava Blair4-6, 3-6
2025-07-24vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 SinglesAleshia Abernathy vs Becky Brittain0-6, 0-3
2025-07-17vs Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 SinglesSondra Simmons vs Sara Wimmer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Taylor Austin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Karen Shokes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Mindy Murray
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Sondra Simmons
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Ana Paula Schweitzer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.06
Aleshia Abernathy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Sandra Reid
published
2.82
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sondra Simmons + Taylor Austin9256% games+7.7% vs expected
Sondra Simmons + Aleshia Abernathy18563% games+6.5% vs expected
Karen Shokes + Sondra Simmons1437% gamesnot enough data
Aleshia Abernathy + Mindy Murray224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Austin
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Karen Shokes
176W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Mindy Murray
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Sondra Simmons
157W–101L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3
Ana Paula Schweitzer
105W–100L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3.5
Aleshia Abernathy
165W–131L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Sandra Reid
10W–27L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Angela Xionschevici
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.