Teams

TDC Schmidt

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Mixed · Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-04vs Avalon MizrachWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeanna Jernigan / Ed Ohman vs Barry George / Michele Smith4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Wyman / Patrick Jernigan vs Marge Street / Darrell Jervey6-3, 6-1
2021-10-21vs Avalon Ghita MIXEDLost 01
L#1 DoublesRamkripa Natarajan / Jeanine Wisor vs Daniela Otto / Andrew Zima7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2021-10-14vs MAC EaleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeanna Jernigan / Chapin Jones vs Nicholas Smith / Susanne Nazur6-7, 4-6
2021-10-13vs ACAC FieldsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Duffy / Jeanine Wisor vs Jeff Bosch / Carol Kaufmann3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-10-07vs Raintree Cheek MixedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChapin Jones / Deanna Jernigan vs Matthew Earle / Sonia Haley6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatrick Jernigan / Nicole Wyman vs William Bryan / Mona Stahling6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-09-09vs KRA HarperWon 10
W#2 DoublesNicole Wyman / Ed Ohman vs Jory Brinkerhoff / Wendy Daniel6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Lauren Duke
published
3.89
Nicole Wyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
Jeanine Wisor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Angela Woods
published 4
3.50
Deanna Jernigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Clavis Smith
published 3.5
3.21
Laura Wheeler
published
3.12
Patrick Jernigan
published
2.63
Dodee Smith
published 3
2.48
Seth Kreiser
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Duke
16W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
4.5
Nicole Wyman
134W–86L career · 3 lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Jeanine Wisor
113W–86L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Angela Woods
9W–14L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Deanna Jernigan
58W–85L career · 3 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Clavis Smith
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Wheeler
28W–18L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Patrick Jernigan
13W–8L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Dodee Smith
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Christopher Limoges
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.48
Seth Kreiser
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.