Teams

Avalon Mizrach

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Mixed · Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-11-06vs Avalon Ghita MIXEDWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Robert Calhoun vs Caroline Ogilvie / Richard Bland6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-23vs KRA HarperSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarry George / Connie Jervey vs William Shirey / Sarah Nicholas6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDarrell Jervey / Joni Albrecht vs Jory Brinkerhoff / Wendy Daniel5-7, 2-6
2021-10-07vs MAC TerrellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWilson Davis / Connie Jervey vs Nathan Caudle / Tanisha Moseley6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGlenn Mizrach / Nancy Mihalko vs Katherine Clapp / Greg Deeb7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-09-29vs Raintree Cheek MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesGlenn Mizrach / Joni Albrecht vs William Bryan / Lorraine McGehee4-6, 2-6
2021-09-09vs Westwood SheaLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilson Davis / Connie Jervey vs Anna Shea / Dutch Jones3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Calhoun / Nancy Mihalko vs Ryan Harris / Rina Dyer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Connie Jervey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Robert Calhoun
published
3.47
Wilson Davis
published
3.37
Nancy Mihalko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Matthew Luchsinger
published
3.10
Sarah Hobgood
published
3.06
Glenn Mizrach
published 3
3.04
Joni Albrecht
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Kristopher Johnson
published
2.91
Darrell Jervey
published 3
2.83
Anna Baird
published 3
2.70
TONYA URQUHART
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Mihalko + Robert Calhoun4168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Connie Jervey
111W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
Robert Calhoun
28W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
Wilson Davis
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Nancy Mihalko
182W–109L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
Matthew Luchsinger
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
Sarah Hobgood
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Glenn Mizrach
13W–28L career · no lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.06
Joni Albrecht
53W–83L career · 2 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kristopher Johnson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Darrell Jervey
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Anna Baird
15W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
TONYA URQUHART
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.