Teams

MAC Terrell

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Mixed · Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs

13 players · average NTRP 3.81 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-10-28vs TDC SchmidtLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Church / John Mulligan vs Seth Kreiser / Laura Wheeler3-6, 3-6
2021-10-21vs ACAC FieldsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Church / Chad Wolff vs Ken Lowenstein / Kimberly Jones6-4, 7-5
2021-10-14vs KRA HarperWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Spivack / Tanisha Moseley vs Jason Fenchuk / Lesley Terminella6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Lisa Yost vs CLIFFORD BRIDGE / Sule Sauvigne6-2, 6-4
2021-10-11vs MAC EaleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Yost / Jeremy Calbreath vs James Murphy / Lauren Bale6-2, 6-1
2021-10-07vs Avalon MizrachLost 01
L#1 DoublesNathan Caudle / Tanisha Moseley vs Wilson Davis / Connie Jervey3-6, 2-6
2021-09-09vs Raintree Cheek MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesIsabel Lee / Jeremy Calbreath vs Shannon Foster / Wayne Tyler6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eric Spivack
published 4.5
3.94
Denise Terrell
published 4
Greg Deeb
published 4
3.71
Colin Atkinson
published 4
3.64
Tanisha Moseley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Jeremy Calbreath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
3.36
John Mulligan
published
3.32
Mary Church
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Chad Wolff
published 3
2.95
Lidia Cousins
published
2.93
Lisa Yost
published
Rebecca Loos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Church + Jeremy Calbreath23564% games+9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Spivack
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Denise Terrell
24W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Colin Atkinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Tanisha Moseley
154W–148L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Jeremy Calbreath
164W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Darrell Eakes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
John Mulligan
23W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
Mary Church
176W–130L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Chad Wolff
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.03
Lidia Cousins
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
Lisa Yost
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
Rebecca Loos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.