Greg Deeb
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RICHMOND, VA
400 matches · 239W–161L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history400 matches
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2019–2025
14 Willow Oaks CC - Dunton 4.0
15 MAC Morgan 8.0
19 MAC Stephens 7.0
2 MTC Stephens 4.0
8.0 Morgan-Huguenot Park
Belmont 7.0 Stephens
MRTC THORNTON
MTC Morgan 4.5 WKEND
TCRC Stephens/Young
10 MAC Resurgence Stephens
3 MAC Captain Morgans Stand
6 MTC Stephens Resurgence at 4.0
8.5 Captain Morgan's Stand at MAC
Burkwood - Carter
Burkwood McKelvey
Burkwood-Colgin
Burkwood-Matthews
Captain Morgan's Stand at MTC
MAC 7.5 Stephens Resurgence
MTC Stephens' Resurgence
Mid-Atlantic/Stephens/55&Over8.0M
Morgan's Stand at MAC8.0
Stephens Resurgence at MAC 7.0
1. September
11 Belmont Dowdy
3 Burkwood Colgin
4 Acac Stephens
5 Burkwood McKelvey/Colgin
5 JRHS Stephens 4.5
6 James River Surge Stephens
6 Stephens Surge at Belmont
7 acac Advantage Stephens
8 MTC Stephens Resurgence
A7 acac Advantage Stephens 4.0
A8 Burkwood Carter
ACAC-Lewis
ACAC-Stephens
Burkwood Carter
Huguenot Park Morgan
10 James River Surge
12 MAC Loza Machine 4.0 Men
12 acac Sipe's Advantage
18 MTC Resurgence 3.5
2 MAC Pettit
2 MAC Snow
5 JRHS Stephens' Surge 7.5
6 ACAC Bardaro/Sebetic
8 JRHS Captain Morgan’s Surge
9 ACAC Advantage 7.0 Stephens
ACAC Richman
ACAC Stephens Mixed Advance
ACAC-Delisio
ACAC-Stephens
B7 ACAC Lewis
B8 acac Advantage Stephen’s 7.5
10 James River Stephens Surge 7.5
13 ACAC Stephens 7.0
14 MAC Snow
7 James River Stephens Surge 3.5
A6 MAC Loza Machine
ACAC Captain Morgan’s Stand
ACAC-Stephens
B2 James River Stephens Surge 3.5
B3 MAC Loza Machine
B4 ACAC Stephens Assault 4.0
B4 MAC Pettit
MAC Terrell
MAC-Snow
16 MAC Machine Loza
2 James River Surge 7.5
5 ACAC Andrews Shake and Bake
6 Rockwood Park Renegades Haynes
7 James River Surge 3.5
A5 ACAC Assault
ACAC-Stephens
C5 MAC Huang
Huguenot Park. Captain Morgan’s Militia (Stephens)
MAC Ealey
11 MTC Sander
3 MTC Pecci
9 James River Surge Stephens 3.5
A6 ACAC Stephens
B2 James River Surge 3.5
C8 MTC Miller
MIDLO-James
MIDLO-Sander
MTC Pecci
MTC Pecci
MTC Tagnesi
MTC Thagard
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
72.5%
66W–25L · 58.1% of games
4.0
48.9%
46W–48L · 49.2% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 38.6% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 52.5% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.9% of games
8.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 43% of games
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
80.8%
42W–10L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
48%
12W–13L · 49.9% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
30W–18L · 53.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
129 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
123 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#1 Singles
1%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.