Teams

Raintree Cheek Mixed

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Mixed · Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-04vs Avalon Ghita MIXEDLost 01
L#1 DoublesTom Foster / Suzanne Spadafora vs Caroline Ogilvie / Andrew Zima4-6, 0-6
2021-10-14vs Westwood SheaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Riedel / Edward Yesbeck vs Craig Heah / Lauren Jones1-6, 5-7
2021-10-07vs TDC SchmidtLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Earle / Sonia Haley vs Chapin Jones / Deanna Jernigan0-6, 3-6
2021-09-30vs ACAC FieldsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Spadafora / Matthew Earle vs Kelly Naughton / Chris Naughton3-6, 0-6
2021-09-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Sonia Haley vs Barry George / Michele Smith6-2, 6-3
2021-09-23vs KRA HarperLost 01
L#3 DoublesRufus Phillips / Michele Riedel vs Lesley Terminella / Jason Fenchuk4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Weeknight Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gary Wills
published 4
3.68
Matthew Earle
published
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Suzanne Spadafora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Sonia Haley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Rufus Phillips
published
3.40
Michele Riedel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Lorraine McGehee
published
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
3.25
Teresa Lancaster
published
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
2.89
Peggy Bryan
published
2.77
Jean Cheek
published
2.76
James Andrews
published 3
Tom Foster
published
Wayne Tyler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Yesbeck + Sonia Haley7555% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Suzanne Spadafora
63W–89L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Sonia Haley
44W–76L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
Rufus Phillips
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Michele Riedel
71W–114L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lorraine McGehee
15W–15L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Teresa Lancaster
7W–23L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.03
Peggy Bryan
28W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.89
Jean Cheek
27W–17L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
James Andrews
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Tom Foster
11W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wayne Tyler
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.