Teams

Naples YMCA / Foley

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-05vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Split 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Matje / Jane Jhanji vs Tara Newhall / Kirsten Forbush6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMira Rochford / MacKenzie Kraft vs Dayna Webre / Kristie McCormick5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-17vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Foley / Sara Wachs vs Diana Wong / Kirsten Forbush1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-10vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Split 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Foley / Lynn Johns vs Diana Wong / Kari Gustafson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Cohen / Sara Wachs vs Tracy Stuben / Gina Adiutori7-6, 6-4
2025-02-03vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMira Rochford / MacKenzie Kraft vs Kari Gustafson / Nicki Sebold1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Defiore / Carolyn Matje vs Dana Wagoner / Kristie McCormick4-6, 3-6
2025-01-27vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Split 11
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Matje / Jane Jhanji vs Diana Wong / Gina Adiutori5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMacKenzie Kraft / Mira Rochford vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Dayna Webre6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-20vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Foley / Sara Wachs vs Dana Wagoner / Laura Jolly6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Johns / Jane Jhanji vs Nicki Sebold / Diana Wong2-6, 2-6
2025-01-13vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Split 11
W#2 DoublesStephanie Foley / Lynn Johns vs Nicki Sebold / Diana Wong4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Kraft / MacKenzie Kraft vs Dayna Webre / Kristie McCormick3-6, 4-6
2025-01-06vs Winter winners/ The Dunes /Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMira Rochford / Carol Clark vs Dayna Webre / Diana Wong4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Lynn Johns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Jane Jhanji
published
4.19
Nada Pivcevic
published
4.15
Sara Wachs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Stephanie Foley
published
4.06
Tracy Maurer
published
4.00
MacKenzie Kraft
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Karen Defiore
published
4.00
Jennifer Hansen
published
3.96
Carolyn Matje
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Macey Tyll
published
3.82
Cheryl Cohen
published 4.5
3.78
Mira Rochford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Michelle Kraft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Wachs + Lynn Johns19956% games−3.1% vs expected
MacKenzie Kraft + Michelle Kraft81151% gamesnot enough data
Sara Wachs + Carolyn Matje3246% gamesnot enough data
MacKenzie Kraft + Mira Rochford134 matchesnot enough data
Mira Rochford + Carolyn Matje044 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Cheryl Cohen134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Tracy Maurer134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Carolyn Matje314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Jane Jhanji
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Nada Pivcevic
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Sara Wachs
147W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
Stephanie Foley
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Tracy Maurer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
MacKenzie Kraft
26W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Karen Defiore
16W–32L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Jennifer Hansen
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Carolyn Matje
59W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Macey Tyll
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4.5
Cheryl Cohen
70W–51L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
Mira Rochford
48W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.78
Michelle Kraft
50W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.