Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-30vs CROW CANYON CC 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Trish O'Connor vs Leda Lim / Lea McSweeney4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-25vs DIAMOND HILLS 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Debbie Baker vs Karen Bibel / Jane Liles6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Cindy Turner vs Karen de Martini / Elena Balletti6-3, 6-0
2023-04-04vs LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Trish O'Connor vs Cathy Lee / Susan Weeks6-1, 6-4
2023-03-27vs ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Pamela Maloney vs Cecily Barclay / Christi Deakin6-3, 7-5
2023-03-26vs CROW CANYON CC 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Jennifer Perkins vs Leda Lim / Teri Perun4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Cindy Turner
published 3.5
3.35
Kathleen Pruden
published
3.33
Audra Lutter
published 3.5
3.30
Gail Pearson
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Pamela Maloney
published
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
3.17
Corrine Christensen
published 3.5
3.07
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
3.00
Michelle Cooke
published
2.99
Catherine Sampietro
published 3.5
2.92
2.77
Anita Lifson
published 3
Ellie Kann
published
Julie Cahill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Maloney + Julie Cahill314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Baker + Lani Aurelius033 matchesnot enough data
Lani Aurelius + Tammie Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Turner
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Kathleen Pruden
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Audra Lutter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Gail Pearson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.30
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
Pamela Maloney
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Corrine Christensen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Michelle Cooke
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Catherine Sampietro
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Cherie Charbonneau
11W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Anita Lifson
6W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Ellie Kann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Cahill
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.