Teams

NITA W 75CWDe Score (Bianchi/Knutte)

2022 NITA2 Winter Combo Daytime Leagues · NITA Winter Daytime 7.5 Combo Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.82 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
W#1 DoublesCindy Bielik / Jane Strien vs Jeanne Gallo / Suzanne McFarlin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Tenuta / Patricia Kladis-Schiappa vs Sharon Hermanns / Vanessa Druckman6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLesa Moskowitz / Carol Yeo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Karin Carney vs Laura Fausey / Marianne Zaval2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Pavlova / Cassandra Engel vs Michele Kleeman / Caroline Noschese6-7, 4-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Tenuta / Jane Strien vs Karin Matura / Lauren A Loeb6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Rebecca Bosack vs Jeanne Gallo / Marika Panton6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Rowen / Karin Carney vs Liz McNeill / Vanessa Druckman6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCindy Bielik / Cassandra Engel vs Patricia Nelson / Becky Sharp6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Good / Carol Yeo vs Mary Ellen Young / Amy Harper6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKerri Sedlacek / Patricia Kladis-Schiappa vs Julie Comey / J Mosca6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCindy Bielik / Cassandra Engel vs Ann Murtaugh / Jackie Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKerri Sedlacek / Karin Carney vs Cara Wilkins / Francine Holmes6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Good / Megan Kostal vs Kristin Lamb / Pauline Tuchscherer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKelly Good / Rebecca Bosack vs Laura Fausey / Michele Kleeman2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Tenuta / Julie Knipstein vs Karin Matura / Stephanie Remelius7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDiana Pavlova / Lesa Moskowitz vs Hilary Fife / Toni Mountcastle6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKelly Good / Megan Kostal vs Wendy Leto / Francine Holmes2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKerri Sedlacek / Rebecca Bosack vs Ann Murtaugh / Pauline Tuchscherer6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Patricia Kladis-Schiappa vs Heidi Darley / Julie Roth6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesLisa Rowen / Mary Dougherty vs Patricia Nelson / Julie Comey7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Rebecca Bosack vs Amy Harper / Becky Sharp7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Good / Carol Yeo vs Cochita Jose / Jyl Bonomo6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKarin Carney / Kelly Good vs Marika Panton / Katie Jones2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Knipstein / Lisa Rowen vs Jeanne Gallo / Julie Hendricks6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Bielik / Megan Kostal vs Liz McNeill / Sharon Hermanns3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKarin Carney / Kelly Good vs Laura Fausey / Marianne Zaval2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Bielik / Jane Strien vs Michele Kleeman / Hilary Fife6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Knipstein / Kelly Tenuta vs Sue Kamphuis / Toni Mountcastle7-6, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKelly Good / Megan Kostal vs Patricia Nelson / Ilona LaRoche3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Bielik / Jane Strien vs Mary Ellen Young / Celeste Sentman6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Pavlova / Lesa Moskowitz vs Robin Dickerson / J Mosca6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKelly Good / Karin Carney vs Jennifer Peterson / Wendy Leto6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarinne Leonard / Cassandra Engel vs Marla Madsen / Ann Murtaugh6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKerri Sedlacek / Patricia Kladis-Schiappa vs Julie Roth / Jackie Smith6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NITA Winter Daytime 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 75CWDe Score (Bianchi/Knutte)93251128250
2NITA W 75CWDd Courts Plus (Barsotti)66201638310
3NITA W 75CWDc Five Star (Delgrosso)66191738308
4NITA W 75CWDb HealthTrack (Brown/Matura)66162048339
5NITA W 75CWDa Tennis & Fitness Cen(Panton/McNeill)39102655380

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Cindy Bielik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.08
Rebecca Bosack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.90
Laurie Knutte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Marinne Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Rowen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Diana Pavlova
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Kerri Sedlacek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Kelly Tenuta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Kelly Good
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.37
Jane Strien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Lesa Moskowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carol Yeo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Karin Carney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Patricia Kladis-Schiappa
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Megan Kostal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
published
Cassandra Engel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Knipstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marinne Leonard + Rebecca Bosack4167% games+14.6% vs expected
Lesa Moskowitz + Patricia Kladis-Schiappa14265% games+8.8% vs expected
Lisa Rowen + Jane Strien5168% games+7.7% vs expected
Lisa Rowen + Cindy Bielik10461% games+6.2% vs expected
Laurie Knutte + Rebecca Bosack12460% games+6.0% vs expected
Marinne Leonard + Cindy Bielik11657% games+4.8% vs expected
Kerri Sedlacek + Cindy Bielik9358% games+4.5% vs expected
Marinne Leonard + Laurie Knutte9758% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Bielik
216W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
4.08
4.5
Rebecca Bosack
119W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Laurie Knutte
256W–121L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Marinne Leonard
156W–82L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Lisa Rowen
153W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Diana Pavlova
20W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Kerri Sedlacek
99W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Kelly Tenuta
90W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
Kelly Good
111W–92L career · 9 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Jane Strien
154W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Lesa Moskowitz
134W–118L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carol Yeo
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Karin Carney
126W–103L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Patricia Kladis-Schiappa
105W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Megan Kostal
74W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Katherine Bianchi
84W–66L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Cassandra Engel
30W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Knipstein
38W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.